Doing this to protect against the fatal error reported in issue #20880. I was not able to reproduce this problem but adding this check is probably a good idea anyway.
### All Submissions:
* [x] Have you followed the [WooCommerce Contributing guideline](https://github.com/woocommerce/woocommerce/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md)?
* [x] Does your code follow the [WordPress' coding standards](https://make.wordpress.org/core/handbook/best-practices/coding-standards/)?
* [x] Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open [Pull Requests](../../pulls) for the same update/change?
<!-- Mark completed items with an [x] -->
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->
### Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Re-indexing `get_available_variations` method values.
Suppose you made changed with `woocommerce_available_variation` hook and skip returning some specific variation product with false value. There is `array_filter` function to filter empty values from `get_available_variations` but it keeps index which convert to js object rather then array on `single-product/add-to-cart/variable.php` template variation form `data-product_variations` attribute, and select box dropdown doesn't show. I just added `array_values` PHP function to reindex after `array_filter` function which convert to js array rather then js object before `get_available_variations` function return.
Closes # .
### How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
1. Before approving pull req just return false on a specific variation via `woocommerce_available_variation` filter.
2. Now check that variation product dropdown doesn't show. Because it needs to reindex array.
### Other information:
* [x] Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
* [ ] Have you written new tests for your changes, as applicable?
* [x] Have you successfully ran tests with your changes locally?
<!-- Mark completed items with an [x] -->
### Changelog entry
> Enter a short summary of all changes on this Pull Request. This will appear in the changelog if accepted.
This commit changes the travis codecoverage from using xdebug to phpdbg, phpdbg seems much faster and gives similar results.
Reason for switching is we have been running into constant timeouts on our codecoverage due to the 50min job limit on travis, which means our codecoverage has not been updated in a couple of months.
* Remove xdebug as it slows tests down, switch to using phpdbg for code coverage.
* Update parameters for phpdbg
* It is qrr not qqr
* Include vendor/bin path when using phpdbg
* Use PHP 7.1 to run phpdbg
* Update phpunit dire
* Include $HOME in phpdbg call to phpunit
* Set no memory limit to avoid out of memory errors.
* Assign timeout group to test_request_url test for paypal and do not execute that on coverage as it causes a memeory timeout. Test needs optimization to run for code coverage.
* @covers usage for methods should be prefixed with ::
This fixes the case where another plugin sets custom menu ordering to be
true, but its filter runs before WooCommerce's filter. Otherwise
WooCommerce's filter will return false, and disallow the other plugin to
customize its menu items.
This commit changes WC_Tests_REST_System_Status tests to use artificial HTTP responses instead of performing external HTTP requests. With this change execution time for these tests droped from 22s to 3s.
This commits changes WC_Unit_Test_Case parent class to WP_HTTP_TestCase (which extends WP_UnitTestCase). This way all WC core test classes can benefit from the functionality provided by WP_HTTP_TestCase if needed. This is necessary because otherwise test classes can use the functionality provided by WC_Unit_Test_Case or WP_HTTP_TestCase. This change should not affect test classes that don't explicitly call one of the WP_HTTP_TestCase features.
Doing this to speed up the test as an HTTP request to an external server is slow and also because it should fix this test that has been failing on Travis only for an unknown reason.
WP test suite starts a transaction when the test starts and roll it back when the test finishes. So it is not necessary to undo database changes using tearDown().
Claudiu Lodromanean
Gerhard Potgieter
Brent Shepherd
Rodrigo Primo
Peter Fabian
LuigiPulcini
Khan M Rashedun-Naby
Emran Ahmed
Alex Sanford
Claudio Sanches