* Add nav_enabled variables for site/layout/page-level control
* _sass: Add a space around `+` operator
* assets: Do not compile based on site.nav_enabled
* _config.yml: nav_enabled can be selectively enabled
* CHANGELOG.md: Add nav_enabled feature and docs
* docs: Prefer em dash in describing minimal layout
* docs: Add section on Selectively hiding or showing the sidebar
* _layouts: Display sidebar based on variable importance
* docs: Update documentation on the minimal layout
* docs: Document site.nav_enabled configuration variable
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>
This follows up from #1259 and closes#1261. Basically, this PR accomplishes the two items discussed in the issue:
1. for all anchors that are *actually* buttons (i.e., have `href="#"`), I've replaced them with a semantic `<button>`
- under the hood, I've made a `.btn-reset` class pulling out the reset from #1259, so there's no visual change
2. for anchors that are ["toggle buttons"](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Roles/button_role#toggle_buttons) (the mobile menu nav, sidebar children/grandchildren toggles), I've added an `aria-pressed` property that is updated as the button is clicked
I've also slightly modified some of the `aria-label`s to make them more consistent. Observe that we *shouldn't* update these as the button is clicked; screen readers use the `aria-pressed` property to add an annotation to each button.
To test this,
- the sidebar children and grandchildren can be done on the deploy preview:
- open an arbitrary page; observe that the sidebar children/grandchildren dropdown ticks now have a proper `aria-label` and `aria-pressed`, as well as otherwise work as intended
- toggle one of the buttons; observe the `aria-pressed` role changing as this is done
- open a grandchild page; observe that the `aria-pressed` has a correct default wrt whether or not the page is active
- the mobile menu can be done on the deploy preview; on a smaller viewport, observe the correct `aria-pressed`
- two features require local changes to test:
- the `site.search.button` needs to be enabled in the `_config.yml`. To test this, locally clone the repo, change the flag, and observe that the button still works as intended + has no visual regressions.
- the collections feature is a bit more complicated. To test this, locally clone the repo, add an arbitrary collection and changes to `_config.yml`, and observe the same behaviour for the sidebar children/grandchildren above
This PR fixes several Axe errors I found while working on https://viewcomponent.org/. I did not see any visual regressions on my deploy, but I'd encourage testing with other sites.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lindsey Wild <35239154+lindseywild@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a catch-all PR that modernizes and updates our Stylelint config, and resolves all open issues. This is a pretty big change - so I want to update all of our related dependencies in lockstep.
In particular, this PR
- [x] updates stylelint to `v14`
- [x] adds in the standard stylelint config for SCSS (`stylelint-config-standard-scss`)
- [x] swaps out `stylelint-config-prettier` for `stylelint-config-prettier-scss`
- [x] ~~properly update `@primer`-related plugins:~~ completely remove `primer` from our configuration
- [x] autofix, manually resolve, or disable all newly-introduced lint errors; **I've avoided manually resolving errors that would be a behavioural change**
- [x] re-runs `npm run format`
See the "next steps" section on some extra thoughts on disabling errors.
(implicitly, I'm also using node 16/the new package-lock format).
### disabling rules and next steps
I've introduced several new disabled rules. Let me quickly explain what's going on; there are two categories of rules I've disabled:
1. rules that were temporary disables; they were frequent enough that I couldn't manually resolve them, but should be simple. **I plan on opening issues to re-enable each of these rules**, just after this PR
- `declaration-block-no-redundant-longhand-properties`: this is just tedious and error-prone
- `no-descending-specificity`: this one is tricky since it could have impacts on the cascade (though that seems unlikely)
- `scss/no-global-function-names`: I think we need to [import map and then use `map.get`](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64210390/sass-map-get-doesnt-work-map-get-does-what-gives), but I'll leave this as out of scope for now
2. rules that are long-term disables; due to the SASS-based nature of our theme, I think we'll keep these in limbo
- `alpha-value-notation` causes problems with SASS using the `modern` syntax - literals like `50%` are not properly interpolated, and they cause formatting issues on the site
- `color-function-notation` also causes problems with SASS, but in this case the `modern` syntax breaks SASS compilation; we're not alone (see this [SO post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71805735/error-function-rgb-is-missing-argument-green-in-sass)).
In addition, we have many inline `stylelint-disable` comments. I'd open a separate issue to audit them, especially since I think some disables are unnecessary.
### on Primer
**note: there hasn't been much other discussion, so I'm going to remove primer's stylelint config.**
If I do add `@primer/stylelint-config`, I get *a ton* of errors about now using `@primer`'s in-built SCSS variables. I imagine that we probably won't want to use these presets (though I could be wrong). In that case, I think we could either:
1. disable all of those rules
4. not use `@primer/stylelint-config`, since we're not actually using primer, and shift back to the standard SCSS config provided by Stylelint
~~Any thoughts here? I also don't have the original context as to why we do use the primer rules, perhaps @pmarsceill can chime in?~~
