These changes accommodate for some difference in the HTML structure AsciiDoc produces for source code listings:
* proper padding for source code listings
* proper vertical margin after source code listings
* proper placement of the copy button if enabled
Closes#1163
This is a prototype for review and discussion. My use and testing of this PR is on top of 6d9d41359c46882d9b64a446d5a83fac5b3e20a7. The changes are trival to rebase to `main` and I'm happy to do so if this prototype moves forward.
* Feature request details in linked issue, fixesjust-the-docs/just-the-docs#1067
* I welcome feedback and all discussion
* A draft doc site of mine using this PR is at https://docs.hidale.com/
To use the prototype, the two include files need to be customized. Here are mine from the draft website 9c0d836408
Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>
Hi everyone, this is a large refactoring PR that looks to **modularize site components** following the discussion in #959. At the top-level, it:
- moves icons, the sidebar, header (navbar, search, aux links), footer, and mermaid components of the `default` layout into their own `_includes`
- creates a new `minimal` layout that does not render the header or sidebar as a proof-of-concept for the composability of components
- documents all existing and new layouts (including vendor code) in the "Customization" section
An important goal of this PR is for it to be **just code motion and flexibility**: there should be **zero impact** on the average end user that only consumes the `default` theme.
The next few sections go in-depth on each of the listed changes.
### new components
The `default` layout contains a "list" of all relevant components. Importantly, some of these components have sub-components:
- the header is split into the search bar, custom code, and aux links
- the icons include imports different icon components, some of which are conditionally imported by feature guards
There are also candidates for future splits and joins:
- the sidebar could be split into navigation, collections, external link, and header/footer code
- the "search footer" could be joined with other search code, which would make it easier to "include search" in one go; *however, this is a markup change*
- @kevinlin1 has pointed out that there is some leakage between the sidebar (which computes parents/grandparents) and the breadcrumbs (which needs them to render). He's graciously added a bandaid fix to `minimal` (which does not render the sidebar). However, in the long term, we should either:
- calculate this in a parent and pass the information to both components
- change how this works entirely (which may happen with multi-level navigation)
@pdmosses has done a great job outlining this and more in his [Modular Layouts test site](https://pdmosses.github.io/modular-layouts/docs/main/).
### minimal layout
Based on @kevinlin1's use-case in just-the-class (see: his [Winter 2023 CSE 373 site](https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse373/23wi/)), we've created a first-class `minimal` layout that does not render the sidebar or header.
In a [comment](https://github.com/just-the-docs/just-the-docs/pull/1058#discussion_r1057015039), Kevin has indicated that we can re-add the search bar in the minimal layout; however, it seems like this would be a code change. I think we should punt this to a future issue/PR.
@pdmosses has also discussed the confusion of `minimal` as a layout and its meaning in inheritance. I've added a note in documentation to clarify the (lack of) inheritance relationship.
### documentation
I've written documentation in the "Customization" page / [Custom layouts and includes](https://deploy-preview-1058--just-the-docs.netlify.app/docs/customization/#custom-layouts-and-includes) section explaining:
- generally, that we use includes/layouts (and pointing to docs)
- the `default` layout and its constituent components (with a warning about name collisions)
- creating alternative layouts with `minimal` as an example
- the inheritance chain of layouts and the vendor layouts that we consume
I've also created (and linked to) a [minimal layout test](https://deploy-preview-1058--just-the-docs.netlify.app/docs/minimal-test/) that is currently a copy of the markdown kitchen sink but with the minimal layout. I think there's room to improve this in the future.
### future work
I think there's a lot we can do. Let me break this into various sections.
Potential follow-ups before `v0.4.0`:
- re-including search in `minimal` (anticipating a minor code change)
- fixing the leakage of parent/grandparent information between the sidebar and breadcrumbs (anticipating no end-user code change, but good to evaluate separately and discuss)
- heavily document this in the migration guide (#1059) and in our RC4 release docs
- improve semantic markup for components (ex `main`, `nav`)
Related work in later minor versions:
- split up components into smaller components
- allow users to easily customize new layouts using frontmatter (see @kevinlin1's [comment in #959](https://github.com/just-the-docs/just-the-docs/issues/959#issuecomment-1249755249))
Related work for `v1.0` (i.e. a major breaking change):
- rename and better categorize existing includes
- standardizing the "custom" includes
- moving other components to the `components/` folder (ex `head`, `nav`)
- potentially: less confusing naming for various components
- potentially separate the search and header as components, so that they are completely independent
Tangentially related work:
- more flexible grid (see @JPrevost's [comment in this PR thread](https://github.com/just-the-docs/just-the-docs/pull/1058#issuecomment-1363314610))
- a formal [feature model](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_model) of JTD, documenting feature dependence (see @pdmosses's [comment in this PR thread](https://github.com/just-the-docs/just-the-docs/pull/1058#issuecomment-1365414023))
- better annotate new features (motivated by writing these docs)
- we should add "New" to new features :)
- we should note when a feature was introduced (I think this is a core part of most software documentation)
- we should annotate things that are "Advanced" in so far as the average Just the Docs user will not use them / they require significant Jekyll knowledge
---
Closes#959.
This PR fixes three bugs:
# first bug
When revising my last PR #1086 I realised a slight bug in the code-copy PR #945 , my change to the css ignored a case. This PR is a hotfix and
Before PR #945:
After PR #945:
Fix:
# second bug
> @simonebortolin @mattxwang I'm trying to write some regression tests for this feature.
>
> If I use GitHub's copy button to copy the following plain text, it preserves all the spaces:
>
> ```
> 1 leading space
> 2 leading spaces and 2 trailing spaces
> 3 internal spaces
> 4 trailing spaces
> ```
>
> Using the new copy button with the same text in this PR branch of JTD gives this:
>
> ```
> 1 leading space
> 2 leading spaces and 2 trailing spaces
> 3 internal spaces
> 4 trailing spaces
> ```
>
> It appears that the leading space from line 1 has been removed, and inserted on all the other lines. Moreover, the 4 trailing spaces have been removed.
>
> BTW, #924 didn't give a precise requirements spec, but mentioned the Microsoft docs UI; @mattxwang mentioned also the GitHub UI. It would be helpful to add a functional spec of what the JTD copy button is supposed to do, as a basis for regression tests.
>
> I'm not aiming at a rigorous test for the UI. Personally (using Safari at the default mag) I find the clipboard icon too small: it just looks like a box, and I can hardly see that there is a clip at the top. But I don't have a suggestion for a better icon.
# third bug
When I re-read the code after the second bug, I noticed a bug that it does not always select the text field to be copied correctly (in case there are also line numbers) is copied:
```
1
2
3
4
# Ruby code with syntax highlighting and fixed line numbers using Liquid
GitHubPages::Dependencies.gems.each do |gem, version|
s.add_dependency(gem, "= #{version}")
end
```
instead of
```
# Ruby code with syntax highlighting and fixed line numbers using Liquid
GitHubPages::Dependencies.gems.each do |gem, version|
s.add_dependency(gem, "= #{version}")
end
```
Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>
The nav scroll feature had stopped working (altogether),
due to the change from absolute to relative urls.
This update uses the document location pathname as the `href`.
It appears to work locally.
This PR combines (and resolves conflicts between) #448, #463, #466, #494, #495, #496, #498, and #572.
The main aim is to facilitate use of several of the implemented features _together_, when using the fork as a remote theme. It should also simplify merging the included PRs into a future release.
The branch [combination-rec-nav](https://github.com/pdmosses/just-the-docs/tree/combination-rec-nav) adds [multi-level navigation](https://github.com/pmarsceill/just-the-docs/pull/462) and (NEW:) [sibling links](https://github.com/pmarsceill/just-the-docs/pull/394) to the branch used for this PR. It includes updated [documentation for the navigation structure](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/docs/navigation-structure/), and reorganised and extended [navigation tests](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/tests/navigation/). The documentation and the tests can be browsed at the (temporary) [website published from the combination-rec-nav branch](https://pdmosses.github.io/just-the-docs/).
_Caveat:_ The changes to v0.3.3 in this PR and #462 have not yet been reviewed or approved, and may need updating before merging into a release of the theme. If you use a branch from a PR as a remote theme, there is a risk of such updates affecting your website. Moreover, these branches are likely to be deleted after they have been merged. To avoid such problems, you could copy the branch that you want to use to your own fork of the theme.
Co-authored-by: Matt Wang <matt@matthewwang.me>
The default is for hyphens to separate tokens in search terms: `gem-based` is equivalent to `gem based`.
This adds `search_tokenizer_separator` as a site configuation option, to support search for hyphenated words.
