76 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
76 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.3;
|
||
|
access;
|
||
|
symbols;
|
||
|
locks; strict;
|
||
|
comment @# @;
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3
|
||
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next 1.2;
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.2
|
||
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next 1.1;
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
||
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next ;
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
desc
|
||
|
@Initial revision
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@Revision 3
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@---+ ProviderService
|
||
|
|
||
|
A provider service, often misleading just termed "provider" (creating confusion with the institutional body as the provider), is a kind of local MessageBrokerService. It is limited to adress local DatasourceServices opposed to a general MessageBroker.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It can take any request and pass it on to the single datasource or just some of them if it is specified in the request header as a list of destinations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
---+++++ Current Protocols
|
||
|
Right now only DiGIR is using it, and it serves
|
||
|
mainly as a resource discovery mechanism. This feature, although
|
||
|
interesting, is not considered essential since there are other ways
|
||
|
to achieve it. Part of the existing networks are already using UDDI.
|
||
|
And networks who are not using it could either use GBIF's UDDI
|
||
|
registry with a specific theme, or could install their own UDDI
|
||
|
registry - there's a free and open source alternative for that:
|
||
|
{jUDDI http://ws.apache.org/juddi/}. Local discovery services, even
|
||
|
not addressed by the specification, could be easily implemented by
|
||
|
specific wrappers, and could be incorporated in future versions of
|
||
|
the protocol if that really proves to be an important feature.
|
||
|
Another suggestion from the BerlinProtocolMeeting was to allow a
|
||
|
ProviderService to accept requests for multiple datasources at the
|
||
|
same time. This would be a new feature for both protocols, not
|
||
|
necessarily easy to implement, and not easily faster than a multi-
|
||
|
threaded web server handling multiple requests at the same time.
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.2
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@Revision 2
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@d7 1
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@Initial revision
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@d6 17
|
||
|
@
|