20 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
20 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258682524" format="1.1" version="1.8"}%
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UBIF.SchemaDiscussion"}%
|
||
|
|
---+!! %TOPIC%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Rather an esthetic issue: I find <nop>DataSets/DataSet odd-looking. I realize that you can write "data set" or "dataset". Googling "dataset" retrieves a wild mixture of both spellings, with "<nop>DataSet" used mostly in .NET/ADO.NET related documents. The <nop>DublinCore (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/) uses "Dataset", with a lower case "s".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If nobody contradicts, I would prefer doing that. Main.BDI is taking the Dataset up from ABCD - was there a discussion in ABCD on this?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 21 May 2004
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In English it should be data set (although Word recognises dataset!) and therefore I would expect to write <nop>DataSet but I don't think it is that important and will go with whatever decision - so I'll assume Dataset unless I hear differently.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- Main.JessieKennedy - 28 May 2004
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Thanks. I think <nop>DublinCore usuage is good precedence. Esthetic reason is less the <nop>DataSet itself, but possible combinations like <nop>DataSetMetadataType. I will change to Dataset and <nop>DatasetMetadataType etc.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 28 May 2004
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1089915445" from="SDD.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization" to="UBIF.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization"}%
|