116 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
116 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.4;
|
||
|
|
access;
|
||
|
|
symbols;
|
||
|
|
locks; strict;
|
||
|
|
comment @# @;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.4
|
||
|
|
date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next 1.3;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.3
|
||
|
|
date 2005.06.07.08.22.55; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next 1.2;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.2
|
||
|
|
date 2005.06.06.21.46.36; author BobMorris; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next 1.1;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
date 2004.11.01.11.26.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next ;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
desc
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.4
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@Added topic name via script
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@---+!! %TOPIC%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1118132575" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
|
||
|
|
(An older discussion was moved to ClosedTopicTopLevelStructureDiscussions, because most of the structures referred there do not correspond with the current UBIF proposal.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The currently proposed top level structure is:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<verbatim>
|
||
|
|
Datasets
|
||
|
|
Dataset
|
||
|
|
Derivation
|
||
|
|
ExternalDataInterface
|
||
|
|
Metadata
|
||
|
|
<single payload element (e. g. DescriptiveData or Units)>
|
||
|
|
</verbatim>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The term <nop>ExternalDataInterface should be changed, see NameForProxyOrInterfaceSection.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 01 Nov 2004
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
Since this page is again out of date as to what is the UBIF structure, I mean here to link to a discussion of <nop>ClassHierarchy objects. Someone should set a link to it where-sever such link best fits. -- Main.BobMorris - 06 Jun 2005
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: Unfortunately, the term "<nop>ClassHierarchy" is used for the hierarchy of classes that are being described (e.g. biological taxa) and should therefore better not be used for this discussion of classes in the schema. It would be better to update this topic instead, Gregor
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.3
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@d1 2
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.2
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@d1 1
|
||
|
|
a1 1
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="BobMorris" date="1118094395" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
|
||
|
|
d21 3
|
||
|
|
a23 1
|
||
|
|
Since this page is again out of date as to what is the UBIF structure, I mean here to link to a discussion of ClassHierarchy objects. Someone should set a link to it where-sever such link best fits. -- Main.BobMorris - 06 Jun 2005
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@d1 22
|
||
|
|
a22 17
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1099308360" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
|
||
|
|
(An older discussion was moved to ClosedTopicTopLevelStructureDiscussions, because most of the structures referred there do not correspond with the current UBIF proposal.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The currently proposed top level structure is:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<verbatim>
|
||
|
|
Datasets
|
||
|
|
Dataset
|
||
|
|
Derivation
|
||
|
|
ExternalDataInterface
|
||
|
|
Metadata
|
||
|
|
<single payload element (e. g. DescriptiveData or Units)>
|
||
|
|
</verbatim>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The term <nop>ExternalDataInterface should be changed, see NameForProxyOrInterfaceSection.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 01 Nov 2004
|
||
|
|
@
|