wiki-archive/twiki/data/ABCD/AbcdConcept0376.txt,v

head	1.3;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.3
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@Initial revision
@


1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept0376

---+++++ Identifier

<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Identifications/Identification/Identifiers/IdentifierRole</verbatim>



---+++++ Group

Identification

---+++++ Subgroup


---+++++ Full Name
Identification type

---+++++ Documentation

An indication of the nature of the verification

---+++++ Content

An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." for a confirmation event or "det." for an identification for which full credit goes to the identifier).

---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values


---+++++ Example Value


---+++++ Example Explanation


---+++++ Reviewer


---++++ Editorial Notes
@


1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d17 1
a17 1

d21 1
a21 1
An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det.").
d25 1
a25 1
An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det.").
a39 2

$$Walter$$ I was curious - why does this element come under 'Identifier' and not directly under identification? Also, should I give a fullname of 'IdentifierRole' or something like 'IdentificationType'?
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@a0 1

d11 1
d21 1
d25 1
d41 1
a41 1

@