wiki-archive/twiki/data/ABCD/AbcdConcept1441.txt,v

head	1.2;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.2
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@Initial revision
@


1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept1441

---+++++ Identifier

<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/PlantGeneticResourcesUnit/AccessionNames/AccessionName</verbatim>



---+++++ Group

Domain

---+++++ Subgroup

PGR

---+++++ Full Name

Accession Name

---+++++ Documentation

A name for the unit that is not covered by the Cultivated Plants Code. 

---+++++ Content

A name given to the accession that cannot be covered by the name structure given for botanical names under identification (i.e. not a formal cultivar or trade designation name). 

---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values


---+++++ Example Value


---+++++ Example Explanation


---+++++ Reviewer

Berendsohn 3 Jun 2005

---++++ Editorial Notes

The following email was received from Dag Terje Endresen of the Nordic Genebank on June 3, 2005: 

"I have looked a little bit into what is the definition of the MCPD concept of ACCENAME (Accession name). I found most central crop databases using the exact same definition as published by the MCPD list from IPGRI: "Either a registered or other formal designation given to the accession. First letter uppercase. Multiple names separated with semicolon without space." Interestingly the concept seems to have been called "cultivar name" in the first versions. In the majority of cases in the NGB database the accession name is identical to the commercial cultivar name. The concept has however sometimes also another content than only repeating the cultivar name. Often for genetic resources the genebank makes selections in the original accession and the resulting sub-sets are often classified as still belonging to the cultivar but given a new accession name. I inlude an example from NGB of this in a Finnish cultivar of Barley.

NGB30   TAIPALE ME0201; OTRA MIX

NGB31   SAVIKYLÄ ME0201; OTRA MIX;

NGB36   LAPJÄRVI ME0402; OTRA MIX

NGB291   OTRA

NGB777   YLITORNIO JP0101; OTRA MIX

NGB781   SASSALI ME0801; OTRA MIX

NGB782   MURTOMAA ME0901; OTRA/HANKKIJA-673

NGB783   UIMANIEMI ME1001; OTRA

NGB784   KUUSELA 1101; OTRA MIX

NGB787   KELUJÄRVI EH0601; OTRA MIX

NGB1162   KASURILA 0401; OTRA

NGB1163   LUIKONLAHTI ME0302; OTRA

NGB1164   SUOTTALA ME0402; OTRA

NGB2804   PERÄNNE AP0103; OTRA

NGB2820   KÖNNI 0401; OTRA

I hope this is helpful for finding the content of the ACCENAME concept. I include also below some online information on the MCPD concept _Accession Name_

---+++++ Definition from MCPD 

http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/publications/pubfile+.asp?ID_PUB=124

11 Accession name (ACCENAME)

Either a registered or other formal designation given to the accession. First letter uppercase. Multiple names separated with semicolon without space. 

Example: Rheinische Vorgebirgstrauben;Emma;Avlon

---+++++ The ECP/GR Pyrus Database [http://www.cra.wallonie.be/pyrus/passport.htm] 

NB : For "accession name", as a general rule the accepted name is the first published name in the pomological literature ; the name must be given in its original language without translation but in international alphabet form. There are, however, exceptions such as when a subsequent name have been so frequently used that it is then taken as the accepted name. For "landraces" each curator has to decide which synonyn fit the best. Subsequently it will be possible to have a field in the database devoted to synonyns.

===== European Central Crop Databases for Lolium and Trifolium repens (ECCDBs)===== 

It is based on the European Forage Passport Descriptor List (EFPDL)* which is itself an extended version of the FAO/IPGRI Multi-Crop Passport Descriptors. http://www.igergru.bbsrc.ac.uk/Welcome/ECCDB/descriptors/descriptors.htm

(ACCNAME) - Cultivar name, Breeder's number or any other formal designation given to the accession.  E.g. 'Aberystwyth S23'.

---+++++ Report of the Technical Meeting on the Methodology of WIEWS 

Radzikow, Poland, 30 September - 3 October 1996

9. The Meeting appreciated the cooperation between FAO and IPGRI in harmonizing multi-crop descriptors for common use in WIEWS, IPGRI crop descriptor lists and for reporting from databases (Appendix 8). The Meeting proposed the following changes in the list: 

- to change the name of descriptor no. 5 from "Cultivar name" to "Accession name",
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@d43 64
@