103 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
103 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RicardoPereira" date="1173791332" format="1.1" version="1.6"}%
|
||
|
|
---+++ GUID1 Plenary Session Minutes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This are the minutes for the plenary session on Feb 1, 2006, in telegraphic format. Feel free to expand it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Cliff Cunningham - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_1_Opening_CliffCunningham_NESCent.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
DonaldHobern - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_2_Introduction_DonaldHobern.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Participants Introduction:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* RicardoPereira - TDWG Infrastructure Project, Brazil
|
||
|
|
* Peter Dawyndt - Ghent, microorganisms, global network of strains
|
||
|
|
* Hideaki Sugawara - Japan, WFCC, GBIF-Japan, nucleotide sequence database (DDBJ)
|
||
|
|
* Stan Blum - California Academy of Sciences, TDWG, GBIF, collection data, DIGIR, DWC
|
||
|
|
* Stinger Guala - Baton Rouge, USDA Plants DB, names, concepts, distribution records, TDWG, DIGIT
|
||
|
|
* MI Zuberi - Bangladesh, lots of biodiversity, Indian subcontinent, population geneticist
|
||
|
|
* DagTerje - IPGRI, global germplasm, index of regional collecting events, Nordic Genebank
|
||
|
|
* Paul Kirk - CABI Bioscience, IF
|
||
|
|
* MattJones - NCEAS, informatics projects, Synthesis activities, SEEK, modeling, metadata
|
||
|
|
* Kevin Richards - Landcare, collections, names, LSID on .NET
|
||
|
|
* Roger Hyam - TDWG, process, architecture
|
||
|
|
* Sally Hinchcliffe - Kew, IPNI, specimens, technical solution with minimal work
|
||
|
|
* Patricia Gensel - NESCent, paleobiology
|
||
|
|
* Andrew Jones - Cardiff, SPICE, LITCHI, persistence of ids
|
||
|
|
* Scott Federhen - GenBank, sequences to specimens, systematic literature
|
||
|
|
* Robert Huber - Bremen, WDC-MARE, data set identification for citation, marine, taxon names, Stratigraphy.net
|
||
|
|
* Donald Hobern - GBIF, TDWG
|
||
|
|
* Lee Belbin - TDWG infrastructure
|
||
|
|
* Damian Barnier - CBIT, identification keys
|
||
|
|
* BobPeet - UNC, Ecoinformatics, vegetation data, VegBank, SEEK taxon group
|
||
|
|
* Ben Szekely - IBM, LSID, best practices
|
||
|
|
* RichPyle - Bishop, NBII Pacific basic,
|
||
|
|
* Simon Coppard - ICZN, vertebrate taxonomy, ZooBank
|
||
|
|
* Jessie Kennedy - Napier, TCS
|
||
|
|
* George Garrity - Michigan, later
|
||
|
|
* Greg Riccardi - FSU, MorphBank, GGF database access and integration services WG
|
||
|
|
* RodPage - Glasgow, TreeBase, LSIDs, Handles, why not tomorrow
|
||
|
|
* Steven Perry - KU, DiGIR 2, LSIDs
|
||
|
|
* Cliff Cunningham - NESCent, find home for all data submitted to evolutionary journals, need GUIDs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
RicardoPereira - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_3_Definitions_RicardoPereira.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Jessie Kennedy - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_4_ReqsForTaxonNamesAndConcepts_JessieKennedy.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
RicardoPereira - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_5_ReqsForSpecimensAndCollections_RicardoPereira.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Greg Riccardi - Collections Management software does hold ids in the short-term
|
||
|
|
* Peter Dawyndt/Sally Hinchcliffe/RichPyle - doesn't work now in practice with current practices, numbers not necessarily unique, history varies
|
||
|
|
* George Garrity - Also live samples
|
||
|
|
* Jessie Kennedy - Clarify why discussed relationships between GUIDs after saying this wasn't the subject
|
||
|
|
* RicardoPereira /Donald Hobern - background for what we are doing
|
||
|
|
* Bob Peet - Be sensitive to the needs for observations, etc.
|
||
|
|
* MattJones - Discussing specimens is interesting because deals with concrete examples, which doesn't apply to observations
|
||
|
|
* George Garrity - Rights management need to be discussed
|
||
|
|
* Scott Federhen - Even for specimens, the record is digital so not clear
|
||
|
|
* Greg Riccardi - QOS is the real issue with GUIDs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* RodericPage - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_8_GUIDs_Metadata_RDF_RodericPage.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Jessie Kennedy - Your inference example - should we believe these inferences
|
||
|
|
* Sally Hinchcliffe - It's the metadata that helps us to know
|
||
|
|
* MattJones - Incompatible inferences are certainly a problem
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Ben Szekely - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_6_LifeSciencesIndentifiers_BenSzekely.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
* Scott Federhen - GenBank not guaranteed to return same byte sequence - FASTA files can be changed by changes to organism names
|
||
|
|
* RichPyle - When should versions be used?
|
||
|
|
* Ben Szekely - recommend you don't, because versioning should really be addressed by metadata linkages
|
||
|
|
* Sally Hinchcliffe - What of multiple services for same LSID?
|
||
|
|
* Ben Szekely - We developed a service to allow resolvers to provide information to originators that they have foreign metadata for the LSID
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* George Garrity - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_7_DigitalObjectIdentifiers_GeorgeGarrity.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
* Paul Kirk - Cost is the issue.
|
||
|
|
* Robert Huber - For WDC-Mare, c. 25 cents per DOI vs. 1000� data acquisition costs per data set
|
||
|
|
* Scott Federhen - RA maintenance of ids is still a cost
|
||
|
|
* George Garrity - what is the user community? What would they pay for?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Donald Hobern - Presentation: [[%ATTACHURL%/GUID_1_Plenary_9_IdentifyingObjects_DonaldHobern.ppt]]
|
||
|
|
* Stan Blum - Do we ever have external objects to which we want to assign GUIDs?
|
||
|
|
* RogerHyam - Objects can have different facets?
|
||
|
|
* Sally Hinchcliffe - Separate between "should" and "is".
|
||
|
|
* RichPyle - Do GUIDs get moved when specimens are transferred to other organizations?
|
||
|
|
* Scott Federhen - Common situation e.g. with Jansen butterflies
|
||
|
|
* Stan Blum - This sort of thing will be modeled through applicability statements
|
||
|
|
* Ben Szekely - My instinct would be to assign new id with link to new authority
|
||
|
|
* Donald Hobern - May wish to attach non-actionable GUIDs to objects and actionable ones to data objects
|
||
|
|
* RichPyle - Applies whenever multiple providers describe same thing
|
||
|
|
* RicardoPereira - Catalogue numbers already exist - cannot change this - need to concentrate on linkages between digital objects
|
||
|
|
* Stan Blum - Cancelation of duplicates requires GUIDs?
|
||
|
|
* MattJones - Need also to meet needs of students and professors sharing data
|
||
|
|
* Jessie Kennedy/Sally Hinchcliffe - We musn't get too hung up on opacity
|
||
|
|
* RicardoPereira - Let's list criteria we have to evaluate systems
|
||
|
|
* Andrew Jones - If we adopt LSID, would it not be sensible to adopt standards in use with other LSID implementations, etc.
|
||
|
|
* Peter Dawyndt - Always need to be able to handle having multiple identifiers for same thing
|
||
|
|
* Jessie Kennedy - Must address the requirements
|
||
|
|
|