41 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
41 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
---++ LSID Software Development
|
||
|
|
||
|
This break-out group identified outstanding issues that need to be addressed regarding LSID software in the short-term.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This work was based on the gap analysis presented on the 2nd day of the [[GUID2Workshop]] and on the discussion that followed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note: This is one of the break-out group formed during the 3rd day of the [[GUID2Workshop]].
|
||
|
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
---+++ Conclusions and Recommendations
|
||
|
|
||
|
---+++++ 1) Refinement of existing software components
|
||
|
|
||
|
The group must address the outstanding gaps and issues identified in LSID software components during the meeting.
|
||
|
1. LSID Java Toolkit: include libraries (jars) that the toolkit depend on, to ease toolkit setup
|
||
|
1. lsidBrowser for Firefox: improve installation documentation (issue raised by Bob and others)
|
||
|
1. LaunchPad for Internet Explorer is based on obsolete technology and is not supported anymore.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Resources should not be spent migrating (porting) resolver authority software to other platforms. Ports should be made by interested parties.
|
||
|
|
||
|
---+++++ 2) Reduce barriers to LSID resolution in external tools and clients
|
||
|
|
||
|
The group at [[GUID2Workshop]] identified that the use of LSID may impose a barrier to external communities to resolve LSIDs and consume Biodiversity Informatics metadata. That is because LSID, a URN scheme, requires special software for resolution.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The group identified two tasks that, if successful, can lower this barrier:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. To contact companies and organizations developing semantic web tools and encourage them to include LSID resolution in their tools
|
||
|
1. Identify key semantic web tools (open source) and examine the possibility of development of plugins and providers to enable LSID resolution
|
||
|
|
||
|
One of the outcomes is to evaluate the feasibility of this a task.
|
||
|
|
||
|
---+++++ 3) Group needs to experiment more with development of client software
|
||
|
|
||
|
Not enough prototype clients have been developed so far to evaluate needs and gaps of client LSID software stack.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
---+++++ Categories
|
||
|
CategoryWorkingGroup
|
||
|
CategoryInfrastructureWG
|