56 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
56 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.2;
|
|||
|
|
access;
|
|||
|
|
symbols;
|
|||
|
|
locks; strict;
|
|||
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1.2
|
|||
|
|
date 2005.12.22.14.31.09; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
|||
|
|
branches;
|
|||
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1.1
|
|||
|
|
date 2005.12.22.14.30.43; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
|||
|
|
branches;
|
|||
|
|
next ;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
desc
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
.
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1.2
|
|||
|
|
log
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
.
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
text
|
|||
|
|
@---+++ Process
|
|||
|
|
The plan for the review process of GUIDs is as follows:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Survey of requirements: open call for input and requirements from all areas of biodiversity informatics, including:
|
|||
|
|
* Data objects requiring GUIDs (specimens; taxon concepts; publications; etc.)
|
|||
|
|
* Application scenarios (allocatÃng GUIDs; discovering existing GUIDs; resolving GUIDs; etc.)
|
|||
|
|
* Issues relating to management of GUIDs within distributed databases (avoidance of duplicate GUIDs identifying different objects; handling of multiple GUIDs identifying the same object; persistence of data; etc.)
|
|||
|
|
* Potential GUID technologies, including advantages and disadvantages of LSIDs and DOIs
|
|||
|
|
* First workshop (3 days, 1-3 February 2006, at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), Durham, North Carolina, USA) to review requirements and evaluate candidate technologies, and to establish working groups
|
|||
|
|
* Working groups to resolve outstanding issues (using mailing lists and/or Wikis to support public discussion) and provide recommendations
|
|||
|
|
* Second workshop (3 days, mid-2006 - location to be defined) to assess recommendations from working groups and to define models and processes for initial implementation
|
|||
|
|
* Publication of TDWG standards for GUIDs and initial implementation of any central services or software tools required to support them
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1.1
|
|||
|
|
log
|
|||
|
|
@Initial revision
|
|||
|
|
@
|
|||
|
|
text
|
|||
|
|
@d2 1
|
|||
|
|
a2 1
|
|||
|
|
The plan for the review process is as follows:
|
|||
|
|
@
|