33 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
33 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.1;
|
||
|
|
access;
|
||
|
|
symbols;
|
||
|
|
locks; strict;
|
||
|
|
comment @# @;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
date 2006.03.02.05.26.52; author BobMorris; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next ;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
desc
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="BobMorris" date="1141277212" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="RevisedSchema"}%
|
||
|
|
---+ %TOPIC%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Although in Agadir we tried hard to avoid internal references (i.e. ID/IDREF or key/keyref), I now believe these may be unavoidable in some instances, including taxon names (because the same taxon may occur at several locations, and because there are representations of inter-taxon relations, such as hosts, bio-control, etc. that may be needed by several taxa or in several locations). We can almost certainly deal with comparison of several different instances of the same taxon used by using GUIDs. I think this will make the discussion come down to whether we choose the complexity of internal references or the size consequences of repeated taxa (or other resources, like images). Comments?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- Main.BobMorris - 02 Mar 2006
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@
|