86 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
86 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.2;
|
||
|
|
access;
|
||
|
|
symbols;
|
||
|
|
locks; strict;
|
||
|
|
comment @# @;
|
||
|
|
expand @o@;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.2
|
||
|
|
date 2006.05.10.10.57.24; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next 1.1;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
date 2005.12.23.09.25.41; author RogerHyam; state Exp;
|
||
|
|
branches;
|
||
|
|
next ;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
desc
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.2
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="RicardoPereira" date="1147258644" format="1.1" version="1.2"}%
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="TipDocuments"}%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Some comments emailed in by Arthur:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. In the Recommendations, I think there separate Recommendation on the
|
||
|
|
consistent naming of TDWG Standards. It is mentioned under 4.9.1, but this
|
||
|
|
is a very important issue that I believe needs separating out. We obviously
|
||
|
|
need to develop a naming convention/standard.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. Another recommendation: I sent Lee some time back an example of a
|
||
|
|
pseudo-standards organisation that included in its documentation a section
|
||
|
|
on "Who the standard is aimed at". I can't find that reference at the
|
||
|
|
moment. "Museum Curators" etc. I think this is a very good idea and would
|
||
|
|
recommend it in the documentation as a mandatory.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. Recommendation 4.6.2. Why "US English"? I think you need to add some
|
||
|
|
justification in your justification statement.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. Recommendation 4.9.5. I think it is worth also including here "How the
|
||
|
|
Standard should be cited" It is often very difficult to find out how to
|
||
|
|
cite /reference a particular standard (and books sometimes). It is easily
|
||
|
|
solved by adding a one line "This Standard is to be cited as: ...." near the
|
||
|
|
Copyright statement.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5. Appendix A
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
a. Botanical Periodicals I believe is now also available as a searchable
|
||
|
|
on-line database (TDWG has not discussed though). There was something on
|
||
|
|
TAXACOM about this some time back.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
b. HISPID - there is now a Version 4. I don't believe that this version has
|
||
|
|
been submitted as a TDWG Standard.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Conn, B.J. (ed.) 2000. HISPID4. Herbarium Information Standards and
|
||
|
|
Protocols for Interchange of Data. Version 4 - Internet only version.
|
||
|
|
Sydney: Royal Botanic Gardens. http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Hispid4/
|
||
|
|
[Accessed 23 Dec 2005].
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-- Main.RogerHyam - 23 Dec 2005@
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1.1
|
||
|
|
log
|
||
|
|
@none
|
||
|
|
@
|
||
|
|
text
|
||
|
|
@d1 2
|
||
|
|
a2 2
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RogerHyam" date="1135329940" format="1.1" version="1.1"}%
|
||
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="Review_TIPDocuments_Dec2005"}%
|
||
|
|
@
|