42 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
42 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GarryJolleyRogers" date="1259118874" format="1.1" version="1.5"}%
|
|||
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="BDI.SDD_"}%
|
|||
|
|
<h2>First :-) meeting of Biological Descriptions IG, Saturday 9-13:00</h2>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(This is the first meeting, because the existing BDI.SDD_ Interest Group has decided to rename itself to Biological Descriptions)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
<h2>Attendance:</h2>
|
|||
|
|
* Donat Agosti
|
|||
|
|
* Andreas M<>ller
|
|||
|
|
* Bob Morris
|
|||
|
|
* Bryan Heidorn
|
|||
|
|
* Charles Kahindo Muzusa-Ngabo
|
|||
|
|
* Alex Chapman
|
|||
|
|
* Cynthia Parr
|
|||
|
|
* Qin Wei
|
|||
|
|
* Franck Theeten
|
|||
|
|
* David Eades
|
|||
|
|
* Gregor Hagedorn
|
|||
|
|
* Jim Graham
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
<h2>TOPICS</h2>
|
|||
|
|
* Brief introduction, Charter
|
|||
|
|
* Key packages versus making the comparision
|
|||
|
|
* Outreach, getting identification key data online
|
|||
|
|
* What are the tasks, who can contribute what?
|
|||
|
|
* Is creation of natural language descriptions from data, aids to publish is in scope of BDI.SDD_? Yes, applications shall support it. D. Dimitirev's 3I is doing natural generation / readable.
|
|||
|
|
* SPM
|
|||
|
|
* RDF/OWL reasoning group: Greg, Bob, Stinger, Martin Pullan likes to review, Cynthia. Try to involve Dan Miranker, Mark Schildhauer
|
|||
|
|
* Cynthia: Use cases, SPM
|
|||
|
|
* Exporting to RDF:BDI.SDD_, translation
|
|||
|
|
* Concentrate on minimum set of RDF-BDI.SDD_ for species pages as RDF:BDI.SDD_
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Australia has an old local version of a SPM-like standard: Flora Australia which has blocks, also has structure for branching keys: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/pubs/fl-australia-schema.html, there is xsd on there.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Task group: expose as many data in BDI.SDD_ as possible
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Task group: discuss possible minor alignment in naming between BDI.SDD_ and SPM with regard to how concepts are named.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Side note on omission in BDI.SDD_: The diagnostic context of a diagnostic description can not unambigiously expressed in BDI.SDD_. For example, the set of diagnostic characters differs whether sister species shall be distinguished or whether all species in a family shall be distinguished
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 22 Sep 2007
|