head	1.8;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.8
date	2009.11.20.02.02.04;	author LeeBelbin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.7;

1.7
date	2007.03.06.17.30.00;	author TWikiGuest;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.6;

1.6
date	2004.07.15.18.02.00;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.5;

1.5
date	2004.06.11.10.15.50;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.4;

1.4
date	2004.05.28.12.12.00;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2004.05.28.11.31.25;	author JessieKennedy;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2004.05.25.07.56.11;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2004.05.21.18.13.49;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@none
@


1.8
log
@none
@
text
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258682524" format="1.1" version="1.8"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UBIF.SchemaDiscussion"}%
---+!! %TOPIC%

Rather an esthetic issue: I find <nop>DataSets/DataSet odd-looking. I realize that you can write "data set" or "dataset". Googling "dataset" retrieves a wild mixture of both spellings, with "<nop>DataSet" used mostly in .NET/ADO.NET related documents. The <nop>DublinCore (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/) uses "Dataset", with a lower case "s".

If nobody contradicts, I would prefer doing that. Main.BDI is taking the Dataset up from ABCD - was there a discussion in ABCD on this?

-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 21 May 2004

In English it should be data set (although Word recognises dataset!) and therefore I would expect to write <nop>DataSet but I don't think it is that important and will go with whatever decision - so I'll assume Dataset unless I hear differently.

-- Main.JessieKennedy - 28 May 2004 

Thanks. I think <nop>DublinCore usuage is good precedence. Esthetic reason is less the <nop>DataSet itself, but possible combinations like <nop>DataSetMetadataType. I will change to Dataset and <nop>DatasetMetadataType etc.

-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 28 May 2004

%META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1089915445" from="SDD.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization" to="UBIF.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization"}%
@


1.7
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@d1 2
a4 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1089914520" format="1.0" version="1.6"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UBIF.SchemaDiscussion"}%
d7 1
a7 1
If nobody contradicts, I would prefer doing that. SDD is taking the Dataset up from ABCD - was there a discussion in ABCD on this?
@


1.6
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@


1.5
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
a2 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1086948950" format="1.0" version="1.5"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UnifiedBioInfoFramework"}%
d17 1
a17 1
%META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1085746259" from="SDD.DatasetCapitalization" to="SDD.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization"}%
@


1.4
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
a2 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085746320" format="1.0" version="1.4"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="OverarchingPatternsForTdwgSchemata"}%
@


1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="JessieKennedy" date="1085743885" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
d7 1
a7 1
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 21 May 2004
d11 5
a15 1
-- Main.JessieKennedy - 28 May 2004 
d17 1
@


1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085471771" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
d8 5
@


1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085163228" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
d3 1
a3 1
Rather estetic issue, but I find <nop>DataSets/DataSet odd looking. I realize that you can write data set or dataset. Googling "dataset" retrieves a wild mixture of both spellings, with <nop>DataSet used mostly in .NET/ADO.NET. The <nop>DublinCore (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/) uses Dataset, with a lower case "s".
@