head 1.5;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
expand @o@;
1.5
date 2009.11.25.03.14.34; author GarryJolleyRogers; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.4;
1.4
date 2009.11.20.02.45.27; author LeeBelbin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.3;
1.3
date 2007.09.23.01.06.13; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2007.09.22.11.24.16; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2007.09.22.09.43.12; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@none
@
1.5
log
@none
@
text
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="GarryJolleyRogers" date="1259118874" format="1.1" version="1.5"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="BDI.SDD_"}%
First :-) meeting of Biological Descriptions IG, Saturday 9-13:00
(This is the first meeting, because the existing BDI.SDD_ Interest Group has decided to rename itself to Biological Descriptions)
Attendance:
* Donat Agosti
* Andreas Müller
* Bob Morris
* Bryan Heidorn
* Charles Kahindo Muzusa-Ngabo
* Alex Chapman
* Cynthia Parr
* Qin Wei
* Franck Theeten
* David Eades
* Gregor Hagedorn
* Jim Graham
TOPICS
* Brief introduction, Charter
* Key packages versus making the comparision
* Outreach, getting identification key data online
* What are the tasks, who can contribute what?
* Is creation of natural language descriptions from data, aids to publish is in scope of BDI.SDD_? Yes, applications shall support it. D. Dimitirev's 3I is doing natural generation / readable.
* SPM
* RDF/OWL reasoning group: Greg, Bob, Stinger, Martin Pullan likes to review, Cynthia. Try to involve Dan Miranker, Mark Schildhauer
* Cynthia: Use cases, SPM
* Exporting to RDF:BDI.SDD_, translation
* Concentrate on minimum set of RDF-BDI.SDD_ for species pages as RDF:BDI.SDD_
Australia has an old local version of a SPM-like standard: Flora Australia which has blocks, also has structure for branching keys: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/pubs/fl-australia-schema.html, there is xsd on there.
Task group: expose as many data in BDI.SDD_ as possible
Task group: discuss possible minor alignment in naming between BDI.SDD_ and SPM with regard to how concepts are named.
Side note on omission in BDI.SDD_: The diagnostic context of a diagnostic description can not unambigiously expressed in BDI.SDD_. For example, the set of diagnostic characters differs whether sister species shall be distinguished or whether all species in a family shall be distinguished
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 22 Sep 2007@
1.4
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
a2 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258685127" format="1.1" reprev="1.4" version="1.4"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="BDI.SDD"}%
d5 1
a5 1
(This is the first meeting, because the existing BDI.SDD Interest Group has decided to rename itself to Biological Descriptions)
d26 1
a26 1
* Is creation of natural language descriptions from data, aids to publish is in scope of BDI.SDD? Yes, applications shall support it. D. Dimitirev's 3I is doing natural generation / readable.
d30 2
a31 2
* Exporting to RDF:BDI.SDD, translation
* Concentrate on minimum set of RDF-BDI.SDD for species pages as RDF:BDI.SDD
d36 1
a36 1
Task group: expose as many data in BDI.SDD as possible
d38 1
a38 1
Task group: discuss possible minor alignment in naming between BDI.SDD and SPM with regard to how concepts are named.
d40 1
a40 1
Side note on omission in BDI.SDD: The diagnostic context of a diagnostic description can not unambigiously expressed in BDI.SDD. For example, the set of diagnostic characters differs whether sister species shall be distinguished or whether all species in a family shall be distinguished
d42 1
a42 1
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 22 Sep 2007
@
1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
a2 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1190509573" format="1.1" reprev="1.3" version="1.3"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="WebHome"}%
d5 1
a5 1
(This is the first meeting, because the existing SDD Interest Group has decided to rename itself to Biological Descriptions)
d26 1
a26 1
* Is creation of natural language descriptions from data, aids to publish is in scope of SDD? Yes, applications shall support it. D. Dimitirev's 3I is doing natural generation / readable.
d30 2
a31 2
* Exporting to RDF:SDD, translation
* Concentrate on minimum set of RDF-SDD for species pages as RDF:SDD
d36 1
a36 1
Task group: expose as many data in SDD as possible
d38 1
a38 1
Task group: discuss possible minor alignment in naming between SDD and SPM with regard to how concepts are named.
d40 1
a40 1
Side note on omission in SDD: The diagnostic context of a diagnostic description can not unambigiously expressed in SDD. For example, the set of diagnostic characters differs whether sister species shall be distinguished or whether all species in a family shall be distinguished
@
1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1190460256" format="1.1" version="1.2"}%
d3 1
a3 1
First :-) meeting of Biological Descriptions IG
d5 1
a5 43
Saturday 9-13:00
Present:
Donat
Andreas
Bob
Bryan
Charles
Alex
Cynthia
Qin Wei
Franck
David Eades
Gregor
Bob
TOPICS
Brief introduction, Charter
Key packages versus making the comparision
Outreach, getting identification key data online
What are the tasks, who can contribute what?
Is creation of natural language descriptions from data, aids to publish is in scope of SDD? Yes, applications shall support it. D. Dimitirev's 3I is doing natural generation / readable.
SPM
RDF/OWL reasoning group
Greg, Bob, Stinger, Martin Pullan likes to review, Cynthia
Cynthia: Use cases, SPM
Exporting to RDF:SDD, translation
Minimum set for species pages as RDF:SDD
d7 25
a35 5
Meta level
d40 1
d42 1
a42 8
Diagnostic context of a diagnostic descr. can not unambigiously expressed in SDD
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 22 Sep 2007@
1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1190454192" format="1.1" version="1.1"}%
d58 4
@