head 1.3; access; symbols; locks; strict; comment @# @; 1.3 date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp; branches; next 1.2; 1.2 date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp; branches; next 1.1; 1.1 date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp; branches; next ; desc @Initial revision @ 1.3 log @Revision 3 @ text @---+++ AbcdConcept0376 ---+++++ Identifier DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Identifications/Identification/Identifiers/IdentifierRole ---+++++ Group Identification ---+++++ Subgroup ---+++++ Full Name Identification type ---+++++ Documentation An indication of the nature of the verification ---+++++ Content An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." for a confirmation event or "det." for an identification for which full credit goes to the identifier). ---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values ---+++++ Example Value ---+++++ Example Explanation ---+++++ Reviewer ---++++ Editorial Notes @ 1.2 log @Revision 2 @ text @d17 1 a17 1 d21 1 a21 1 An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det."). d25 1 a25 1 An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det."). a39 2 $$Walter$$ I was curious - why does this element come under 'Identifier' and not directly under identification? Also, should I give a fullname of 'IdentifierRole' or something like 'IdentificationType'? @ 1.1 log @Initial revision @ text @a0 1 d11 1 d21 1 d25 1 d41 1 a41 1 @