head	1.9;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.9
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.8;

1.8
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.7;

1.7
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.6;

1.6
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.5;

1.5
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.4;

1.4
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@Initial revision
@


1.9
log
@Revision 9
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept0049

---+++++ Identifier

<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Metadata/Owners/Owner/Organisation</verbatim>



---+++++ Group

Agent

---+++++ Subgroup


---+++++ Full Name

Data source owner organisation 

---+++++ Documentation

Organisation acting as or representing the legal owner of the data source.

---+++++ Content

Organisation acting as or representing the legal owner of the data source.

---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values


---+++++ Example Value


---+++++ Example Explanation


---+++++ Reviewer
Berendsohn 25 May 2005

---++++ Editorial Notes
@


1.8
log
@Revision 8
@
text
@d18 1
a18 1
Collection owner organisation
d22 1
a22 1
Organization acting as or representing the legal owner of the data collection.
d26 1
a26 1
Organization acting as or representing the legal owner of the data collection.
d38 1
a38 1

a40 4

Something I noticed in the schema itself. In some places the word organisation is spelled with an 's' as here and in other places with a 'z' (as in gathering agent).

I have tried to stick to british English throughout. One of the reasons is the use of -ise and -isation. American English does not allow this. Use of s makes it much simpler for non-English speakers, because there are no exceptions. However, some things may have crept in because of Gregor Hagedorn's use of American English. 
@


1.7
log
@Revision 7
@
text
@d22 1
a22 1
Contact organisation for the legal owner of the data collection.
d26 1
a26 1
Organisation acting as the legal owner of the data collection or associated with the owner.
@


1.6
log
@Revision 6
@
text
@d44 1
a44 1
$$Yael$$ I have tried to stick to british English throughout. One of the reasons is the use of -ise and -isation. American English does not allow this. Use of s makes it much simpler for non-English speakers, because there are no exceptions. However, some things may have crept in because of Gregor Hagedorn's use of American English. 
@


1.5
log
@Revision 5
@
text
@d44 1
a44 1
$$Yael$$ I have tried to stick to british English throughout. One of the reasons is the use of -ise and -isation. American English does not allow this. Use of s makes it much simpler for non-English speakers, because there are no exceptions. 
@


1.4
log
@Revision 4
@
text
@d42 3
a44 1
$$Walter$$ Something I noticed in the schema itself. In some places the word organisation is spelled with an 's' as here and in other places with a 'z' (as in gathering agent).
@


1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@d41 2
@


1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d26 1
a26 1
Organisation to contact for the legal owner of the data collection.
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@a0 1

d11 1
d18 1
d22 1
d26 1
a40 2


@