head	1.5;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.5
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.4;

1.4
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@Initial revision
@


1.5
log
@Revision 5
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept0576

---+++++ Identifier

<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/SpecimenUnit/Marks/Mark/Images</verbatim>



---+++++ Group
Container

---+++++ Subgroup
Repeatable


---+++++ Full Name


---+++++ Documentation
Image(s) of label or inscription

---+++++ Content
An image or (rarely) images of the specimen's label or inscription, given as a reference to the ID of a multimedia object given for the unit.  

---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values


---+++++ Example Value


---+++++ Example Explanation


---+++++ Reviewer
Berendsohn 14 Apr 2005

---++++ Editorial Notes

I did not see comments for this - should I just put something like "An image of the label or inscription found on or associated to the unit"?

This was an unedited area of the schema. I changed it for v. 2.01; see AbcdConcept01438 
@


1.4
log
@Revision 4
@
text
@d41 1
a41 1
$$Yael$$ This was an unedited area of the schema. I changed it for v. 2.01; see AbcdConcept01438 
@


1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@d5 1
a5 1
<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/SpecimenUnit/Marks/Mark/IMAGE</verbatim>
d10 1
a10 2

Domain
d13 1
a14 1
Specimen
d20 1
a20 1

d23 1
a23 1

d35 1
a35 1

d39 1
d41 1
a41 1
$$Walter$$ I did not see comments for this - should I just put something like "An image of the label or inscription found on or associated to the unit"?
@


1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d11 1
d15 1
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@a0 1

d39 1
@