head	1.4;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.4
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2007.01.09.00.00.00;	author MoinMoin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@Initial revision
@


1.4
log
@Revision 4
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept0983

---+++++ Identifier

<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Gathering/NearNamedPlaces/NamedPlaceRelation</verbatim>

[@@DerivedFlag]

---+++++ Group
Gathering

---+++++ Subgroup


---+++++ Full Name
Named place relation derived flag

---+++++ Documentation
A flag indicating that the named place relationship or the placename given here is the result of an interpretation of the original data.

---+++++ Content
A flag indicating that the name of - or the relation to - the place is not that originally indicated by the collector, but has been derived (e.g. by means of transforming a historical place name to a modern one, by translating the place name, by tranforming values like "upriver" to compass bearings, etc.)

---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values
True, False, or not stated.

---+++++ Example Value
n/a

---+++++ Example Explanation
n/a

---+++++ Reviewer
Berendsohn 15 Apr 2005

---++++ Editorial Notes
@


1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@a36 2

$$Yael$$ This is an example that perhaps can serve as a general example for the "derived" flag.
@


1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d10 1
a10 1

d16 1
a16 1

d19 1
a19 1

d22 1
a22 1

d25 1
a25 1

d28 1
a28 1

d31 1
a31 1

d34 1
a34 1

d38 1
a38 1
$$Walter$$ What comments go here?
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@a0 1

d38 1
a38 1

@