head 1.39;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
1.39
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.38;
1.38
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.37;
1.37
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.36;
1.36
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.35;
1.35
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.34;
1.34
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.33;
1.33
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.32;
1.32
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.31;
1.31
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.30;
1.30
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.29;
1.29
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.28;
1.28
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.27;
1.27
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.26;
1.26
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.25;
1.25
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.24;
1.24
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.23;
1.23
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.22;
1.22
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.21;
1.21
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.20;
1.20
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.19;
1.19
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.18;
1.18
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.17;
1.17
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.16;
1.16
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.15;
1.15
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.14;
1.14
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.13;
1.13
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.12;
1.12
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.11;
1.11
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.10;
1.10
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.9;
1.9
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.8;
1.8
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.7;
1.7
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.6;
1.6
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.5;
1.5
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.4;
1.4
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.3;
1.3
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@Initial revision
@
1.39
log
@Revision 39
@
text
@---++ Meta
Metadata item. These elements describe the content, reference or base of the dataset, an individual record or an object linked to a record (e.g. a picture).
Label: Metadata
---++++ Identifiers
Codes or fields that serve to identify data objects or physical objects, including record identifiers, field and accession ID's and Codes, unique IDs, _named collections_, collector's field number etc.
Label: Identifiers
---++++ Basis
Items that classify the underlying physical object of the record.
Label: Basis and kind
---++++ IPRS
Items relating to intellectual property rights, ownership, versioning (editions), restrictions for use, or responsibility for the data.
Label: IPR, versioning, edit history and other statements
---++++ Language
Items related to the language and/or script of the text or the document. All language attributes belong here. In the introduction, some text on the identification of the character set in XML (and that in current use in implementations) would be appropriate.
Label: Language and character sets.
---++++ UDDI
Technical data items used in the UDDI registry.
Label: UDDI Registry items
---++ Identification
Items releated to the identification event, including Identifier, date and source of the identification. Not the taxon or name identified
Label: Identification event
---++ IResult
Identification result. Has the following subgroups:
Label: Identification Result
---++++ Taxon
Subgroup with items related to the (biological) taxon name identified, including its classification and vernacular names but not the security of its identification.
Label: Taxonomic result
---++++ Other
Subgroup with items related to non biological identification results.
Label: Non-taxonomic result
---++ Gathering
Items describing the collection or observation event including the geographical location, ecological observations at the site, and numbers or other codes given at the time of the gathering event.
Label: Gathering
---++ Domain
Items that are specific to a certain collection domain. Subgroups are the respective container names in the schema.
Label: Collection domain-specific items.
---++++ Specimen
Data items that are specific to units representing specimens (as opposed to observations without a physical object transferred to a collection institution.
Suggested label: Specimen collections
---++++ Observation
Data items that are specific to units representing observation records (as opposed to specimens).
Suggested label: Observation records
---++++ Culture
Data items specific to units in microbial and similar culture collections.
Proposed label: Culture collections
---++++ Mycological
Data items specific to mycological and lichenological units.
Proposed label: Mycological and lichenological collections
---++++ Herbarium
Data items specific to units in herbaria.
Proposed label: Herbaria
---++++ BG
Data items specific to units in botanical gardens.
Proposed label: Botanic gardens
---++++ PGR
Data items specific to units in plant genetic resource collections.
Proposed label: Plant genetic resources
---++++ Zoological
Data items specific to zoological units.
Proposed label: Zoological collections
---++++ Palaeontological
Data items specific to palaeontological units.
Proposed label: Palaeontological collections
---++ MOF
Elements stating Measurements and Facts.
Label: Measurements and Facts
---++++ MOF-Gathering
Subgroup for measurements and facts relating to the gathering event and site. Includes Altitude, Co-ordinates etc.
Label: Gathering-related measurements and facts
---++++ MOF-Unit
Subgroup for measurements and facts relating to the unit itself
Label: Unit-related measurements and facts
---++++ Sequences
Subgroup for molecular sequences as a special type of "facts"
Label: Molecular sequence data
---++++ SAS
Stage, Age and Sex
Label: Stage, Age and Sex
---++ Media
Elements found in the Multimedia type and the Reference type (with links to other groups where appropriate)
Label: Multimedia and References
---++++ Multimedia
Images, soundfiles etc.
Label: Multimedia
---++++ References
Literature references
Label: Bibliographic references
---++++ Record-URI
Direct link to an on-line version of this unit record.
Label: Record URI
---++ Agent
Elements used in the types contacts, i.e. person or organisation names and related items (addresses)
Label: Agents
---++ Container
Label: n/a
---++++ Repeatable
Subgroup for items that only serve as containers for repeatable (unbounded). In the item description, both "Content" and "Documentation" should be set to the text "A container element for several [[insert][full name of repeatable element]]
Label: n/a
---++++ Structural
Subgroup for container elements that serve to subdivide the schema and group many different items (e.g. Unit)
Label: n/a
---++ Technical
Items used to add or extend technical typing (e.g. restrictions on string length; imposing exclusive choices ["representation"], etc.).
Label: n/a
---++ AA
Items to describe relationships between units
Label: Unit Relations: Associations and Assemblages
---++++ Association
Label: Associations
---++++ Assemblage
Label: Assemblages
---++ Unit Extension
Label: Unit extensions
---++ Other
Items that cannot be assigned to one of the groups defined, e.g. Notes under Unit.
@
1.38
log
@Revision 38
@
text
@d6 1
a6 1
---++++ Identifiers
d11 1
a11 1
---++++ Basis
d16 1
a16 1
---++++ IPRS
d21 1
a21 1
---++++ Language
d26 1
a26 1
---++++ UDDI
d43 1
a43 1
---++++ Taxon
d48 1
a48 1
---++++ Other
d64 1
a64 1
---++++ Specimen
d69 1
a69 1
---++++ Observation
d74 1
a74 1
---++++ Culture
d79 1
a79 1
---++++ Mycological
d84 1
a84 1
---++++ Herbarium
d89 1
a89 1
---++++ BG
d94 1
a94 1
---++++ PGR
d99 1
a99 1
---++++ Zoological
d104 1
a104 1
---++++ Palaeontological
d115 1
a115 1
---++++ MOF-Gathering
d120 1
a120 1
---++++ MOF-Unit
d125 1
a125 1
---++++ Sequences
d130 1
a130 1
---++++ SAS
d140 1
a140 1
---++++ Multimedia
d145 1
a145 1
---++++ References
d150 1
a150 1
---++++ Record-URI
d165 1
a165 1
---++++ Repeatable
d170 1
a170 1
---++++ Structural
d185 1
a185 1
---++++ Association
d189 1
a189 1
---++++ Assemblage
@
1.37
log
@Revision 37
@
text
@a0 4
Added subgroups for Domain ($$Yael$$ please note).
-----
@
1.36
log
@Revision 36
@
text
@a2 2
$$WALTER$$ I have asked our mineralogy folk about what term they use as the equivalent of "taxon".
d50 1
a50 3
Suggested Label: Taxonomic result
_My idea is that we will have a separate subgroup for mineralogy, but I don't know if the mineralogists call their classes "taxon" as well. Could you ask somebody at the NHM? If not, this last question is solved as well._
@
1.35
log
@Revision 35
@
text
@d184 1
a184 1
Items used to add or extend technical typing (e.g. restrictions on string length).
@
1.34
log
@Revision 34
@
text
@d1 5
a5 1
$$Neil$$ Removed the OK marks to improve readability. Added subgroups for Domain ($$Yael$$ please note).
d54 1
a54 5
$$NEIL$$ "I think that there is a taxonomy of minerals as well, so we might get into trouble here later. Do you have another idea for the label? "
_I also think that there is a mineralogy classification, but I'm not sure why that should lead us into trouble? If the result of an identification is a classified mineral, that is as good as a classified organism? Alternatively, we could delete the subgroups from Identification Result and deal with everything in the one Group?_
My idea is that we will have a separate subgroup for mineralogy, but I don't know if the mineralogists call their classes "taxon" as well. Could you ask somebody at the NHM? If not, this last question is solved as well.
@
1.33
log
@Revision 33
@
text
@d72 10
@
1.32
log
@Revision 32
@
text
@d1 2
a5 2
{OK}
a10 2
{OK}
a15 2
{OK}
a20 2
{OK}
a25 2
{OK}
a30 2
{OK}
a36 2
{OK}
a42 2
{OK}
a47 2
{OK}
a58 2
{OK}
a64 2
{OK}
d68 28
d97 4
a100 1
Items that are specific to a certain collection domain. Subgroups are the respective container names in the schema.
d102 2
a103 1
{OK}
d105 1
a105 1
Label: Collection domain-specific items.
a110 2
{OK}
a115 2
{OK}
a120 2
{OK}
a125 2
{OK}
a128 1
a130 2
{OK}
a133 1
a135 2
{OK}
a140 2
{OK}
a145 2
{OK}
a150 2
{OK}
a156 2
{OK}
a160 2
{OK}
a165 2
{OK}
a170 2
{OK}
a173 1
a175 2
{OK}
d179 1
a179 2
{OK}
a184 2
{OK}
a188 2
{OK}
a192 2
{OK}
a195 1
@
1.31
log
@Revision 31
@
text
@a0 50
$$WALTER$$
* Of course, I assumed that we will author these things together, in the end.
_ That's great - actually I think that we might be able to use some of the text from the RLG metadata guidelines (for which I was a joint author) in the section on character sets. I'll check it out._
* Interesting. I am a novice to Wiki as well, so what did you intend to do with the
thing?
_ The documentation claims that it introduces a line break, so helping to save some screen real-estate and distinguishing the subheads from the main headings. However, using it also seems to reveal the actual format codes. I guess it doesn't matter much so long as they can be distinguished._
* I found that formatting generally looks much nicer using Firefox than with Explorer. You did note that the "level 4 subheads" are the so-called subgroups, did you?
_I do have Firefox, but have not yet used it on the wiki. Yep, I did spot the relationship. _
* Yes please, do go ahead. Do you intend to do it on the Wiki or in a word processor? I can work with both. Once you have something, let me know (although at the moment I manage less work than I had hoped for). This can also be helpful for Yael.
_ I will transfer to using the wiki exclusively._
* I am not too happy with that, [[moving][Record URI into Identifiers]] although I recognise the reasoning. I'd suggest to put it under Media, as a subcategory of its own (see below). What do you think?
_Agreed._
* I did not find the suggestion, but proceeded to make one myself (see below). I changed the Group name to avoid automatic Wiki linking, to AA. In this context, I think that there may be some useful bits and pieces of text (also for other parts of the documentation $$Yael$$) in the BioCISE Model article in Taxon (see: http://www.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/CollectionModel/)
_Agreed. I have changed the labels slightly to just "Associations" and "Assemblages" as the "of Units" seems to be redundant._
* Edit history: See suggested new label.
_Agreed._
* Basis and kind: I rather leave it under Meta as a separate subgroup same as identifiers (it is really more of a metadata item than identifiers, isn't it?)
_Agreed._
* I mooved Sex and Age to MOF and changed the explanation of MOF to make it independent of the type (was already needed for Sequences).
_Agreed - good move._
* I changed the Other group.
_Agreed._
* Again: I went through and changed the "Suggested Label" to "Label" where agreed and suggested some labels (for you to delete "suggested", if agreed.
_Done._
-----
** Walter, I think that we are pretty much there wrt the structure and headings for the Introduction. Changes can always be accommodated if necessary but I think that we are sufficiently in agreement that I will transfer the headings to the Introduction page and start filling in the text. See you there, Neil.
-----
d11 1
a11 1
{OK}
d13 1
a13 1
Suggested Label: Identifiers
d66 1
a66 1
$$WALTER$$ "I think that there is a taxonomy of minerals as well, so we might get into trouble here later. Do you have another idea for the label? "
d70 2
@
1.30
log
@Revision 30
@
text
@d54 1
a54 1
Agreed.
d61 1
a61 1
Agreed.
d68 1
a68 1
Agreed
d75 1
a75 1
Agreed.
d82 1
a82 1
Agreed.
d89 1
a89 1
Agreed.
d97 1
a97 1
Agreed.
d105 1
a105 1
Agreed
d112 1
a112 1
Agreed
d114 1
a114 1
Label: Taxonomic result
d123 1
a123 1
Agreed
d131 1
a131 1
Agreed
d139 1
a139 1
Agreed
d147 1
a147 1
Agreed
d154 1
a154 1
Agreed
d161 1
a161 1
Agreed
d168 1
a168 1
Agreed
d176 1
a176 1
Agreed
d184 1
a184 1
Agreed
d191 1
a191 1
Agreed
d198 1
a198 1
Agreed
d205 1
a205 1
Agreed
d213 1
a213 1
Agreed
d219 1
a219 1
Agreed
d226 1
a226 1
Agreed
d233 1
a233 1
Agreed
d241 1
a241 1
Agreed
d247 1
a247 1
Agreed
d253 1
a253 1
Agreed
d259 1
a259 1
Agreed
d265 1
a265 1
Agreed
@
1.29
log
@Revision 29
@
text
@d1 1
a1 3
$$Neil$$
_Will need some help with this one! _
d5 1
a5 1
_Note that I have added some formatting to level 4 subheads to try and make it a bit clearer. This didn't quite work as I expected, but it does make the main groups stand out better. I can change it back if'n you don't like it._
d9 3
a11 1
I found that formatting generally looks much nicer using Firefox than with Explorer. You did note that the "level 4 subheads" are the so-called subgroups, did you?
d13 1
a13 1
_I would like to start editing the actual Introduction page today, if possible. Please indicate if you are happy with the heading and sub-heading labels and I will start with them. Of course, they can always be changed later if we wish.
d17 1
a17 1
_Record URI - This could be moved into Identifiers? _
d19 1
a19 1
* I am not too happy with that, although I recognise the reasoning. I'd suggest to put it under Media, as a subcategory of its own (see below). What do you think?
d21 1
a21 1
_ Associations and Assemblages: Question: do you need a subgroup (= subtitle)? See my suggestion below_
d25 2
d29 2
d33 2
d37 2
d41 2
a42 1
-----
d45 4
d59 1
a59 1
Codes or fields that serve to identify data objects or physical objects, including record identifiers, field and accession ID's and Codes, unique IDs, _named collections_ etc.
d68 1
a68 1
Agreed ?
d70 1
a70 1
Suggested Label: Basis and kind
d77 1
a77 1
Suggested Label: IPR, versioning, edit history and other statements
d114 1
a114 1
Suggested Label: Taxonomic result
d116 3
a118 1
$$Neil$$ I think that there is a taxonomy of minerals as well, so we might get into trouble here later. Do you have another idea for the label?
d174 1
a174 1
Age, Stage and Sex
d176 1
a176 1
Agreed?
d178 1
a178 1
Suggested Label: Stage, Age and Sex
d205 1
a205 1
Agreed?
d207 1
a207 1
Suggested Label: Record URI
d247 1
a247 1
Agreed?
d253 1
a253 1
Agreed?
d255 1
a255 1
Suggested Label: Associations of units
d259 1
a259 1
Agreed?
d261 1
a261 1
Suggested Label: Assemblages of units
@
1.28
log
@Revision 28
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
$$WALTER$$ New responses to "Some things still have to be agreed on:"
d3 1
a3 1
* _Note that I have added some formatting to level 4 subheads to try and make it a bit clearer. This didn't quite work as I expected, but it does make the main groups stand out better. I can change it back if'n you don't like it._
d5 1
a5 1
* _I would like to start editing the actual Introduction page today, if possible. Please indicate if you are happy with the heading and sub-heading labels and I will start with them. Of course, they can always be changed later if we wish.
d7 1
a7 7
-----
- I have added Language [[to][Meta]]
* _Agreed_
-----
d9 1
a9 1
- I have changed the "Suggested Label" to "Label" where agreed, suggested some labels (for you to delete suggested, if agreed) and added some "Label?" where an appropriate title or subtitle is missing.
d11 1
a11 1
* _Some labels still to be agreed and new suggestions added_
d13 1
a13 1
-----
d15 1
a15 1
- (was 3) Collections and Surveys
d17 1
a17 1
I would put this under Identifiers, because it groups records into a certain (identified) category.
d19 1
a19 1
* _Agreed._
d21 1
a21 1
-----
d23 1
a23 1
- (was 4) Associations and Assemblages could perhaps be titled "Grouping units: Associations and Assemblages" or "Unit relations: Associations and Assemblages" and be given Group rank.
d25 1
a25 1
Question: do you need a subgroup (= subtitle)? See my suggestion below.
d27 1
a27 1
* _Agreed._
d29 1
a29 1
-----
d31 1
a31 3
- Edit history (see below), I am not quite sure what this is.
* _This was the revision history of the record itself, but I see that you now have versioning under IPR. I suggest that it be moved there (with subsequent label change) and deleted as a stand-alone group._
d34 1
a34 4
- Basis and kind (see below), what belongs here apart from Record Basis?
* _The other candidate was AbcdConcept0401 Kind of Unit. However, both of these could be moved to Identifiers and deleted as a stand-alone group?_
a54 4
What would you put here apart from Record Basis?
$$WALTER$$ The other candidate was AbcdConcept0401 Kind of Unit. However, both of these could be moved to Identifiers and deleted as a stand-alone group?
d57 1
a57 1
Suggested Label: Basis and kind [[or][to be moved into Identifiers]]
d64 1
a64 3
Suggested Label: IPR, versioning and other statements
$$WALTER$$ Possible label change to include the previous Edit History group?
d71 1
a71 3
Suggested Label: Language and character sets.
* _Will need some help with this one! _
d73 1
a73 1
---++++ UDDI registry items
d78 1
a78 12
Suggested Label: UDDI Registry items
$$WALTER$$ Group name could be abbreviated to "UDDI" ?
---++++ Edit history
I am not quite sure which data items should go under this heading. Past accessions?
$$WALTER$$ This was the revision history of the record itself, but I see that you now have versioning under IPR. I suggest that it be moved there (with subsequent label change) and deleted as a stand-alone group.
Agreed ?
Suggested Label: [[to][be deleted as a group]]
d103 2
d110 1
a110 1
Suggested Label: Non-taxonomic result
d126 1
a126 1
Suggested Label: Collection domain-specific items.
d130 1
a130 1
Elements pertaining to the Measurements and Facts type
d141 1
a141 1
Suggested Label: Gathering-related measurements and facts
d148 1
a148 1
Suggested Label: Unit-related measurements and facts
d150 1
a150 1
---++++ MOF-Sequences
d157 8
d171 1
a171 1
Suggested Label: Multimedia and References
d178 1
a178 1
Suggested Label: Multimedia
d185 8
a192 1
Suggested Label: Bibliographic references
d226 1
a226 1
Agreed ?
d230 1
a230 1
---++ AandA
d232 1
a232 1
Agreed
d236 12
d256 1
a256 8
Items that cannot be assigned to one of the groups defined (should be resolved).
- Age and Sex
- Record URI
$$WALTER$$ This could be moved into Identifiers?
- Notes
@
1.27
log
@Revision 27
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
$$Neil$$ Some things still have to be agreed on:
d3 1
a3 1
- Please have a look at the descriptions of the Subgroups under Metadata.
d5 1
a5 1
- I have added Language
d7 13
a19 1
- I have changed the "Suggested Label" to "Label" where agreed, suggested some labels (for you to delete suggested, if agreed) and added some "Label?" where an appropriate title or subtitle is missing.
d23 3
a25 1
_This refers to the element NamedCollectionsOrSurveys which is . I have left it under "Other"._
d27 1
a27 1
I would put this under Identifiers, because it groups records into a certain (identified) category.
d29 1
a29 1
- (was 4) Associations and Assemblages could perhaps be titled "Grouping units: Associations and Assemblages" or "Unit relations: Associations and Assemblages" and be given Group rank. _Agreed. I have used the latter._
d33 4
d39 4
d45 4
d52 1
a52 3
Agreed ?
Suggested Label: Metadata
d54 1
a54 1
---++++ Identifiers
d56 1
d59 1
a59 1
Agreed ?
d63 2
a64 1
---++++ Basis
d66 1
a66 1
Items that classify the underlying physical object of the record.
d68 1
a68 1
$$Neil$$, what would you put here apart from Record Basis?
d72 1
a72 1
Suggested Label: Basis and kind
d74 2
a75 1
---++++ IPRS
d77 3
a79 1
Items relating to intellectual property rights, ownership, versioning (editions), restrictions for use, or responsibility for the data.
d81 1
a81 1
Agreed ?
d83 2
a84 1
Suggested Label: IPR and other statements
d86 1
a86 1
---++++ Language
d88 1
a88 1
Items related to the language and/or script of the text or the document. All language attributes belong here. In the introduction, some text on the identification of the character set in XML (and that in current use in implementations) would be appropriate.
d90 1
a90 1
---++++ UDDI registry items
d92 1
d95 3
a97 1
Agreed ?
d99 1
a99 1
Suggested Label: ?
d101 2
a102 1
---++++ Edit history
d104 1
a104 1
$$Neil$$: I am not quite sure which data items should go under this heading. Past accessions?
d108 1
a108 1
Suggested Label: ?
d111 1
d116 1
a116 1
Suggested Label: Identification event
d119 1
d126 1
a126 1
---++++ Taxon
d131 1
a131 1
Suggested Label: ?
d133 1
a133 1
---++++ Other
d138 1
a138 1
Suggested Label: ?
d141 1
d149 1
d154 1
a154 1
Suggested Label: Collection domain specific items.
d157 1
d164 1
a164 1
---++++ MOF-Gathering
d169 1
a169 1
Suggested Label: ?
d171 1
a171 1
---++++ MOF-Unit
d176 1
a176 1
Suggested Label: ?
d178 1
a178 1
---++++ MOF-Sequences
d183 1
a183 1
Suggested Label: Molecular sequence data
d186 1
d191 1
a191 1
Suggested Label: ?
d193 1
a193 1
---++++ Multimedia
d198 1
a198 1
Suggested Label: ?
d200 1
a200 1
---++++ References
d208 1
d213 1
a213 1
Suggested Label: Agents
d221 1
a221 1
---++++ Repeatable
d228 1
a228 1
---++++ Structural
d236 1
d245 1
a245 1
Agreed?
d253 1
a253 1
Suggested Label: Unit extensions
d256 1
a258 2
- Collections and Surveys _see discussion under 3 above_
d262 1
@
1.26
log
@Revision 26
@
text
@d48 1
a48 1
---++++ IPR and other statements
d54 1
a54 1
Suggested Label: ?
@
1.25
log
@Revision 25
@
text
@d5 2
d56 4
d195 1
a195 1
Items used to add or extend technical typing (e.g. restrictions on string length). Please also use for language attributes.
d197 1
a197 1
Agreed
@
1.24
log
@Revision 24
@
text
@d19 2
d36 1
a36 1
---++++ Basis and kind
d40 2
d44 1
a44 1
Suggested Label: ?
@
1.23
log
@Revision 23
@
text
@d155 1
a155 1
Suggested Label: ?
d191 1
a191 1
== AandA
@
1.22
log
@Revision 22
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
$$WALTER$$ My responses to "Some things still have to be agreed on:"
d3 1
a3 1
2. We could also have subheadings under Metadata as follows:
d5 1
a5 1
Metadata
d7 1
a7 11
Identifiers
Basis and kind
IPR and other statements
UDDI Registry items
_Agreed - I have also added "Edit History" (see 5. below)._
3. I am still not sure what the Collections and Surveys stands for.
d11 1
a11 5
4. Associations and Assemblages could perhaps be titled "Grouping units: Associations and Assemblages" or "Unit relations: Associations and Assemblages" and be given Group rank.
_Agreed. I have used the latter._
5. Edit History (should this not go under Meta? Does it still exist in v. 2.0)?
d13 1
a13 1
_Agreed. I have moved it under Meta. It exists in v2.0 as the RevisionData group._
d15 1
a15 1
6. What is the Collections and Surveys under Other? If it is something like project data, we have it under Gathering (part of the event data)
d17 1
a17 5
_See item 3 above._
7. Extension of the schema needs it's own group.
_Agreed. _
a21 2
with respect to (i) technical issues such as data provision and contacts (if something is wrong), (ii) IPR issues (intellectual property rights including ownership) and (iii) issues of versioning (edition) or responsibility for the data.
d28 5
a32 1
Codes or fields that serve to identify data objects or physical objects, including record identifiers, field and accession ID's and Codes, unique IDs etc.
d38 4
d46 4
d54 4
d62 4
d71 2
d78 1
a78 1
Suggested Label: Identification Result
d85 2
d92 2
d99 2
d106 2
d113 1
a113 1
Suggested Label: Measurements and Facts
d120 2
d127 2
d134 2
d139 4
d146 4
d155 2
d160 2
d166 3
a168 1
AGREED
d173 3
a175 1
AGREED
d180 3
a182 1
AGREED
d187 3
a189 1
AGREED
d191 1
a191 1
---++ Unit Relations
d193 1
a193 1
---++++ Associations and Assemblages
d195 1
a195 1
AGREED
d201 2
d206 1
a206 1
- Collections and Surveys ??
@
1.21
log
@Revision 21
@
text
@d50 3
a52 1
_Agreed._
d54 1
d56 1
d58 1
a58 1
---++++ Basis and kind
d60 1
a60 1
---++++ IPR and other statements
d62 1
a62 1
---++++ UDDI Registry Items
d64 1
a64 1
Agreed.
d159 1
a159 1
$$WALTER$$ AGREED ?
a167 2
- Edit History ?? Moved to Meta
@
1.20
log
@Revision 20
@
text
@a2 4
1 Identfiers were duplicated. I would prefer to have them in one place, including field and accession ID's and Codes. I also suggest to transfer them to metadata as follows.
_Agreed._
d38 1
a38 1
Metadata item. These elements describe the content of the dataset, an individual record or an object linked to a record (e.g. a picture) with respect to (i) technical issues such as data provision and contacts (if something is wrong), (ii) IPR issues (intellectual property rights including ownership) and (iii) issues of versioning (edition) or responsibility for the data.
d40 3
a42 1
Agreed.
d48 6
@
1.19
log
@Revision 19
@
text
@d23 1
a23 1
_This refers to the element which is ABCDConcept0854. I have left it under "Other"._
d31 1
a31 1
_Agreed. I have moved it under Meta. It exists in v2.0 as the group._
@
1.18
log
@Revision 18
@
text
@d23 1
a23 1
_This refers to the element which is directly under between and . I have left it under "Other"._
@
1.17
log
@Revision 17
@
text
@d10 8
a17 4
Identifiers
Basis and kind
IPR and other statements
UDDI Registry items
@
1.16
log
@Revision 16
@
text
@d5 1
a5 1
Agreed.
d15 1
a15 1
Agreed - I have also added "Edit History" (see 5. below).
d19 1
a19 1
This refers to the element which is directly under between and . I have left it under "Other".
d23 1
a23 1
Agreed. I have used the latter.
d27 1
a27 1
Agreed. I have moved it under Meta. It exists in v2.0 as the group.
d31 1
a31 1
See item 3 above.
d35 1
a35 1
Agreed.
@
1.15
log
@Revision 15
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
$$NEIL$$ Some things still have to be agreed on:
d5 2
d15 2
d19 2
d23 2
d27 2
d31 2
d35 1
d52 1
a52 1
$$NEIL$$ Agreed?
d111 6
a121 4
_WALTER, I will use Agent as a heading and will include Contacts, but I was considering that References should be under Meta?_
_NEIL_ References should be under Multi Media, actually.
a124 4
Container elements. - Associations and Assemblages
- Associations and Assemblages
- Associations and Assemblages
d143 1
a143 1
---++ Relations between units: Associations and Assemblages
d145 3
a147 1
$$NEIL$$ AGREED ?
d151 1
d156 2
a157 1
- Edit History ??
d159 1
d161 1
d163 1
@
1.14
log
@Revision 14
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
YAEL: I am discussing Groups now with Neil. Don't worry and keep assigning the original ones until we got through.
d3 19
a21 1
NEIL: Note that the headers are short forms which should be replaced with more meaningful titles later on. We are only discussing structure presently.
a22 1
WALTER: I am happy to use the existing groups and have suggested more meaningful labels for use in the Introduction beneath each, where different from the Groupname.
d31 10
d110 6
a115 1
Container elements.
d120 2
d125 2
d130 9
d142 2
a143 7
_Neil, I will return to this later today, I hope_
_WALTER, I suggest that Other contains the following:
- Associations and Assemblages
- Identifiers -> Subtype under Meta?
- Edit History
- Basis and Kind
- Collections and Surveys
a145 1
- Unit Extension
a146 1
but I'm happy to discuss_
@
1.13
log
@Revision 13
@
text
@d10 1
a10 3
_NEIL, this includes the IP in your "IPR, Contacts and References"? _
_WALTER, will include IPR and References. Contacts will be included in Agent._
d17 1
a17 3
_NEIL, this is included in your "Identification"?_
_WALTER, Agreed._
d22 1
a22 3
_NEIL, all this is also included in your "Identification"?_
_WALTER, Agreed - I will split this out._
d27 3
a29 1
Items related to the (biological) taxon name identified, including its classification and vernacular names but not the security of its identification.
d32 3
a34 1
Items related to non biological identification results.
d39 1
a39 3
_NEIL, I take this is the same for you ""_
_WALTER, Agreed._
d44 1
a44 3
_NEIL, this corresponds to your "Domains"?_
_WALTER, Agreed._
d49 6
a54 4
_NEIL, I take this is the same for you _ I suggest to have the following subgroups:
mof related to gathering
mof related to unit
Sequences
d56 1
a56 1
_WALTER, Agreed._
d58 9
a66 1
Suggested Label: Measurements and Facts
d71 1
a71 3
_NEIL, this corresponds to your "Multimedia"? Do you include references here?_
_ WALTER, Agreed._
d76 1
a76 1
_NEIL, this corresponds to the Contacts and References in your "IPR, Contacts and References"_
d78 1
a78 1
_WALTER, I will use Agent as a heading and will include Contacts, but I was considering that References should be under Meta?_
d83 1
a83 1
Container elements that are used only to group repeatable elements. In the item description, both "Full name" and "Documentation" should be set to the text "A container element for several [[insert][full name of repeatable element]]
d85 2
a86 1
_ NEIL: n/a for introduction _
d88 2
a89 1
_ WALTER, Agreed - I will not use this._
a93 4
_ NEIL: ?_
_WALTER, I won't be using this one either._
d97 1
d100 1
a100 1
- Identifiers
d102 1
a102 1
- Basis and Kind
@
1.12
log
@Revision 12
@
text
@d13 1
d29 1
d61 1
d77 1
@
1.11
log
@Revision 11
@
text
@d11 1
d19 1
d26 1
d40 1
d47 1
d57 1
d65 1
d72 1
d80 1
d87 1
@
1.10
log
@Revision 10
@
text
@d3 3
a5 1
NEIL: Note that the headers are short forms which should be replaced with more meaningful titles later on. We are only discussing structure presently.
d11 2
d18 1
d24 2
d37 1
d43 1
d52 2
d59 1
d65 2
d72 1
d77 2
a78 1
_ NEIL: ?_
d81 13
a93 1
Items that cannot be assigned to one of the groups defined (should be resolved).
@
1.9
log
@Revision 9
@
text
@d1 3
a3 1
YAEL: I am discussing Groups now with Neil. Don't worry and keep assigning the original ones until we got through.
@
1.8
log
@Revision 8
@
text
@d1 2
d5 3
d10 3
d15 3
d20 1
d23 1
d26 3
d31 3
d35 7
a41 1
Elements pertaining to the Measurements and Observations type
d43 4
a46 1
Elements found in the Multimedia type and the Reference type
d49 3
d54 3
d59 3
@
1.7
log
@Revision 7
@
text
@d16 1
a16 1
Elements pertaining to the MeasurementAndObservations type
@
1.6
log
@Revision 6
@
text
@d22 1
a22 1
Container elements that are used only to group repeatable elements. These should
d24 1
d26 1
@
1.5
log
@Revision 5
@
text
@a0 22
---- AbcdSchemaGroups!\ *Edit conflict - other version:* ----
---++ Meta
Metadata item. These elements describe the content of the dataset, an individual record or an object linked to a record (e.g. a picture) with respect to (i) technical issues such as data provision and contacts (if something is wrong), (ii) IPR issues (intellectual property rights including ownership) and (iii) issues of versioning (edition) or responsibility for the data.
---++ Identification
Items releated to the identification event, including Identifier, date and source of the identification. Not the taxon or name identified
---++ IRes
Identification result. Has the following subgroups:
---+++ Taxon
Items related to the (biological) taxon name identified, including its classification and vernacular names but not the security of its identification.
---+++ Other
Items related to non biological identification results.
---++ Gathering
* Domain
* MOF
* Media
* POA
* Container
* Technical
* Other
---- AbcdSchemaGroups!\ *Edit conflict - your version:* ----
a24 2
---- AbcdSchemaGroups!\ *End of edit conflict* ----
@
1.4
log
@Revision 4
@
text
@d1 1
d21 28
@
1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@d1 11
a11 1
---+ Meta
a12 4
Metadata item. These elements describe the content of the dataset, an individual record or an object linked to a record (e.g. a picture) with respect to (i) technical issues such as data provision and contacts (if something is wrong), (ii) IPR issues (intellectual property rights including ownership) and (iii) issues of versioning (edition) or responsibility for the data.
* Identification
* Gathering
* TON
@
1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d1 2
a2 1
---+ Meta
@
1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@d1 12
a12 10
* GroupMetadata
* GroupIdentification
* GroupGathering
* GroupTaxonName
* GroupDomainSpecific
* GroupMeasurementsAndFacts
* GroupReferencesAndMultimedia
* GroupPersonsAndOrganisations
* GroupOthers
* GroupTechnicalTypes
@