head 1.6; access; symbols; locks; strict; comment @# @; 1.6 date 2009.11.25.03.14.36; author GarryJolleyRogers; state Exp; branches; next 1.5; 1.5 date 2009.11.20.02.45.28; author LeeBelbin; state Exp; branches; next 1.4; 1.4 date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp; branches; next 1.3; 1.3 date 2004.08.18.09.57.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp; branches; next 1.2; 1.2 date 2004.07.29.14.18.10; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp; branches; next 1.1; 1.1 date 2004.07.28.15.55.00; author JacobAsiedu; state Exp; branches; next ; desc @none @ 1.6 log @none @ text @%META:TOPICINFO{author="GarryJolleyRogers" date="1259118876" format="1.1" version="1.6"}% %META:TOPICPARENT{name="SchemaDiscussion"}% ---+!! %TOPIC% I have noticed that SDD or should i say UBIF does not ensure that Classname's are unique even in the same Dataset. A Class can be defined twice with the same Label,Rank,LSID etc etc with different keys of course. I am in the process of writing some kind of a simplistic SDD editor and this is an issue i am struggling with right now. Here is a snippet of an example borrowed from Gregor's SDD_tech.xml with a few additions. lsid.gbif.net:www.fishbase.org:1029 http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/SpeciesSummary.cfm?ID=1029 species lsid.gbif.net:www.fishbase.org:1029 http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/SpeciesSummary.cfm?ID=1029 species -- Main.JacobAsiedu - 28 Jul 2004 Thanks for pointing this out. What do you propose? I would think, requiring the label to be unique for each language should be sufficient. Of course, really the different linking IDs should be unique as well, but that is a bit still under development and discussion. -- Gregor - 29 Jul 2004 --- I have added language specific uniqueness constraints and close the topic. Many thanks! -- Gregor Hagedorn - 18 August 2004 %META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1092822970" from="SDD.NonUniqueNessOfClassName" to="SDD.ResolvedTopicNonUniqueNessOfClassName"}% @ 1.5 log @none @ text @d1 1 a1 1 %META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258685128" format="1.1" reprev="1.5" version="1.5"}% d5 1 a5 1 I have noticed that BDI.SDD or should i say UBIF does not ensure that Classname's are unique even in the same Dataset. d9 1 a9 1 I am in the process of writing some kind of a simplistic BDI.SDD editor and this is an issue i am struggling with right now. @ 1.4 log @Added topic name via script @ text @d1 2 d5 1 a5 3 %META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1092823020" format="1.0" version="1.3"}% %META:TOPICPARENT{name="SchemaDiscussion"}% I have noticed that SDD or should i say UBIF does not ensure that Classname's are unique even in the same Dataset. d9 1 a9 1 I am in the process of writing some kind of a simplistic SDD editor and this is an issue i am struggling with right now. d15 10 a24 10 lsid.gbif.net:www.fishbase.org:1029 http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/SpeciesSummary.cfm?ID=1029 species d28 3 a30 3 Cypselurus heterurus (Rafinesque, 1810) d33 2 a34 2 lsid.gbif.net:www.fishbase.org:1029 http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/SpeciesSummary.cfm?ID=1029 d51 1 @ 1.3 log @none @ text @d1 2 @ 1.2 log @none @ text @d1 1 a1 1 %META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1091110690" format="1.0" version="1.2"}% d42 1 a42 1 Gregor - 29 Jul 2004 d44 6 a49 2 --- @ 1.1 log @none @ text @d1 1 a1 1 %META:TOPICINFO{author="JacobAsiedu" date="1091030100" format="1.0" version="1.1"}% d39 7 @