head	1.7;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.7
date	2007.03.06.17.30.00;	author TWikiGuest;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.6;

1.6
date	2004.10.27.09.13.18;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.5;

1.5
date	2004.10.26.23.06.12;	author RichardPyle;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.4;

1.4
date	2004.10.26.15.24.00;	author NozomiJamesYtow;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2004.10.26.13.02.35;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2004.10.26.10.52.31;	author SallyHinchcliffe;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2004.10.26.10.08.00;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@none
@


1.7
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@---+!! %TOPIC%

%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1098868398" format="1.0" version="1.6"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="LinneanCore"}%
The originally proposed name by Jerry Cooper with his initial proposal was <nop>LinnaeanCore. Karen Wilson proposed to simplify the spelling to <nop>LinneanCore, under which name it was discussed in Christchurch. Richard Pyle proposes to change it to <nop>LinneausCore, to use the same pattern as in <nop>DarwinCore

Votes: 

1. Change to <nop>LinneausCore

Richard Pyle: "I think it should be "LinnaeusCore", rather than "LinnaeanCore" (or whatever spelling variant of the adjective form is correct).  I know this is trivial and nit-picky, but unless anyone objects, I'll henceforth refer to it this way (to maintain consistency with the Darwin & Gutenberg equivalents).

2. Keep <nop>LinneanCore

Gregor Hagedorn: Until a few weeks ago I thought "<nop>DarwinCore" uses the pattern of <nop>DublinCore, i. e. it went back to a meeting in the city of Darwin, and used because this is such a fitting coincidence. This is a myth as I found out, but it shows that <nop>DarwinCore may not be the best precendent - although I have no intention of changing it and think it sounds great. I guess in my feeling the genitive Linnean simply sounds better and more appropriate."

Chris Lyal: "I happen to prefer <nop>LinneanCore, because as a taxonomist I am committed to stability in nomenclature, because it is already referred to as such in a number of documents (try it on Google) (although I admit the synonym <nop>LinnaeanCore) - and '<nop>LinnaeusCore' invites confusion with the software developed by ETI and I'd like to avoid this.  However, Jerry holds IPR,
I guess."

James Ytow: "I only followed spelling of the Linnean Society of London."  Isn't it a schema to exhange Linnean name strings?

Sally Hinchcliffe: "I also think we should keep Linnean Core - it doesn't really make sense, but it sounds better (Darwin and Dublin both also end in 'n')"

Richard Pyle: "I concede to the masses -- so unless there are any objections, I think we should stick with <nop>LinneanCore and close this topic."
@


1.6
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@


1.5
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RichardPyle" date="1098831972" format="1.0" version="1.5"}%
d13 1
a13 1
Gregor Hagedorn: Until a few weeks ago I thought "<nop>DarwinCore" uses the pattern of <nop>DublinCore, i. e. it went back to a meeting in the city of Darwin, and used because this is such a fitting coincidence. This is a myth as I found out, but it shows that <nop>DarwinCore may not be the best precendent - although I have no intention of changing it and think it sounds great. I guess in my feeling the genetive Linnean simply sounds better and more appropriate."
d22 1
a22 2
Richard Pyle: "I concede to the masses -- so unless there are any objections, I think we should stick with <nop>LinneanCore and close this topic."

@


1.4
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="NozomiJamesYtow" date="1098804240" format="1.0" version="1.4"}%
d21 3
@


1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1098795755" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
d18 1
a18 1
James Ytow: "I only followed spelling of the Linnean Society of London. If necessary, we can change the name and move its place later."
@


1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="SallyHinchcliffe" date="1098787951" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
d3 1
a3 1
The originally proposed name by Jerry Cooper with his initial proposal was <nop>LinnaeanCore. Karen Wilson proposed to simplify the spelling to <nop>LinneanCore, under which name it was discussed Christchurch. Richard Pyle proposes to change it to <nop>LinneausCore, to use the same pattern as in <nop>DarwinCore
a20 2

-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 26 Oct 2004
@


1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1098785280" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
d20 2
@