head	1.2;
access;
symbols;
locks;
comment	@# @;


1.2
date	2007.03.06.17.30.00;	author TWikiGuest;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2003.11.21.10.15.00;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@none
@


1.2
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@---+!! %TOPIC%

%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1069409700" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="NameForStandard"}%
(This is a discussion area based on the previous extensive discussions in person and on the email list, documented in NameForStandard.)

I think we just have to come out with some really personal choices. I held myself back partly because I did like the idea (first raised by Chuck) to forge a family of multiple tdwg standards that have a common naming pattern. I proposed this in the plenary summary discussion in Lisbon (twdg 2003) but the other groups were not very enthusiastic. So, we are free to choose.

Anyway, my preferences are:

1. <nop>DescriptionML - we can correctly grab a broad are, SDD is not restricted to biology<br/>
2. <nop>SDD - Structured Descriptive Data<br/>
3. <nop>CompL (spoken compel) - comparative data language<br/>
4. <nop>xDelta - to honor Delta<br/>

(or <nop>ComeOn, <nop>ComparativE Ontology Notation?)

Please add your hitlists, maybe something will emerge!

Gregor Hagedorn - 21 Nov 2003

---
@


1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@