head	1.6;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.6
date	2009.11.25.03.14.33;	author GarryJolleyRogers;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.5;

1.5
date	2009.11.20.02.45.25;	author LeeBelbin;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.4;

1.4
date	2007.03.06.17.30.00;	author TWikiGuest;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.3;

1.3
date	2006.04.25.12.10.42;	author BobMorris;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2006.04.25.09.02.50;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2006.04.25.07.46.48;	author GregorHagedorn;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@none
@


1.6
log
@none
@
text
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="GarryJolleyRogers" date="1259118873" format="1.1" version="1.6"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="BDI.SDD_"}%
---+!! %TOPIC%

Bob: Here list topics for discussion by their name (see WhatToDoWithElementsMarkedForDiscussion) as in SDD1.1b8
   * ColorRangeSampleData
      * Gregor: I believe the element corresponding to the type is !SampleData/SamplingEvent/SamplingUnit/__ColorRange. I am not sure what the issue is - whether to include it or not? Last time you convinced me that color ranges, although desirable may be to complicated to be appropriately dealt with in the current proposal. I therefore marked with double underscore.
      * Bob: I meant to put my points on record, which I have now done, referencing the type ColorRangeSampleData. I agree that the ..../_ColorRange should come out for now.


   * Gregor: I believe !TaxonHierarchy/TaxonHierarchyType should be moved to !TaxonHierarchy/Specification/TaxonHierarchyType
   * %RED%Bob: How critical is this? I thought we agreed that the rearranging was all frozen for 1dot1beta8.%ENDCOLOR%

-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 25 Apr 2006@


1.5
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
a2 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258685125" format="1.1" reprev="1.5" version="1.5"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="BDI.SDD"}%
d14 1
a14 1
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 25 Apr 2006
@


1.4
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@d1 2
a4 2
%META:TOPICINFO{author="BobMorris" date="1145967042" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="WebHome"}%
d6 3
a8 3
	* ColorRangeSampleData
		* Gregor: I believe the element corresponding to the type is !SampleData/SamplingEvent/SamplingUnit/__ColorRange. I am not sure what the issue is - whether to include it or not? Last time you convinced me that color ranges, although desirable may be to complicated to be appropriately dealt with in the current proposal. I therefore marked with double underscore.
		* Bob: I meant to put my points on record, which I have now done, referencing the type ColorRangeSampleData. I agree that the ..../_ColorRange should come out for now.
d11 2
a12 2
	* Gregor: I believe !TaxonHierarchy/TaxonHierarchyType should be moved to !TaxonHierarchy/Specification/TaxonHierarchyType
	* %RED%Bob: How critical is this? I thought we agreed that the rearranging was all frozen for 1dot1beta8.%ENDCOLOR%
a14 1

@


1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@


1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1145955770" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
d4 1
a4 1
	* !ColorRangeSampleData
d6 1
d10 1
@


1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1145951208" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
d4 2
a5 1
	* ColorRangeSampleData
d8 2
@