wiki-archive/twiki/data/UBIF/LinneanCoreCanonicalAuthors...

118 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext

head 1.5;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
1.5
date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.4;
1.4
date 2004.12.13.16.04.38; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.3;
1.3
date 2004.11.10.00.20.32; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2004.11.09.22.20.05; author RichardPyle; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2004.11.08.14.53.04; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@none
@
1.5
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@---+!! %TOPIC%
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1102953878" format="1.0" version="1.4"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="LinneanCore"}%
Authorship should be normalized as much as possible. However, some redundant authorship information (like authors before "ex" and after "in") are welcome to be able to generate full name-string (with author) variants. *Description of the type in the xml schema:* "The authorship and publication details (including the year on publication, the true date of publication, and the "in"-part of a citation)."
Fundamental issues about what sort of authorship information LC needs to track, and where it differs (by convention or by Code) between botany/zoology/bacterial/viral/cultivar domains is discussed under LCNameAuthorshipConventions. -- Richard Pyle - 09 Nov 2004
<h3>Discussion</h3>
With version 0.1.6 three alternative models are presented for discussion, please see LCCanonicalAuthorshipDiscussion016
<small>Earlier discussions: LC version 0.1.4 see LCCanonicalAuthorshipDiscussion014.</small>
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 13. Dec. 2004
@
1.4
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@
1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1100046032" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
d3 12
a14 9
*Schema type description:* "The authorship and publication details (including the year on publication, the true date of publication, and the "in"-part of a citation)."
Normalized as much as possible, but providing information about redundant authorship to be able to generate full name-string (with author) variants. Example: the author before "ex" should be given, although redundant.
Richard: Before we discuss too much the structure of authorship elements within LC, I think we need to first resolve some fundamental issues about what sort of authorship information LC needs to track, and where it differs (by convention or by Code) between botany/zoology/bacterial/viral/cultivar domains. I have created the new page LCNameAuthorshipConventions to document these fundamental issues. -- 09 Nov 2004
Attempt to discuss LC version 0.1.4, Proposal 1 and 2: LCCanonicalAuthorshipDiscussionGH
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 08 Nov 2004
@
1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RichardPyle" date="1100038805" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
d3 1
a3 1
*Type description:* The authorship and publication details (including the year on publication, the true date of publication, and the "in"-part of a citation).
@
1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1099925584" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
d7 2
@