wiki-archive/twiki/data/UBIF/RevisionStatusEnum.txt,v

91 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext

head 1.4;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
1.4
date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.3;
1.3
date 2006.05.10.08.57.52; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2005.03.21.22.44.22; author JenniferForman; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2004.08.25.11.12.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@none
@
1.4
log
@Added topic name via script
@
text
@---+!! %TOPIC%
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1147251472" format="1.1" version="1.3"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="EnumeratedValues"}%
See [[http://wiki.cs.umb.edu/twiki/pub/UBIF/EnumeratedValues/UBIF-Docu-Enumerations.html#RevisionStatusEnum][UBIF enumeration info]] for a tabular overview of values.
Revision Status may be applied to the entire data collection as well as to individual objects (a specimen, a class description, etc.). Exact semantics are only defined for the first and the last category. The semantics of the intermediate (level 1 to 5) may be chosen freely by the user. The relative positions should be maintained, however: If, for example, three revision steps are planned (2 intermediate, reaching <nop>FullyRevised on third), it would be recommended to use <nop>RevisionLevel2, <nop>RevisionLevel4, <nop>FullyRevised.
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 25 Aug 2004
@
1.3
log
@none
@
text
@d1 2
@
1.2
log
@none
@
text
@d1 3
a3 3
%META:TOPICINFO{author="JenniferForman" date="1111445062" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="EnumerationTypes"}%
See [[http://wiki.cs.umb.edu/twiki/pub/UBIF/EnumerationTypes/UBIF-Docu-Enumerations.html#RevisionStatusEnum][UBIF enumeration info]] for a tabular overview of values.
a7 1
@
1.1
log
@none
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1093432320" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
d3 6
a8 5
See [[http://efgblade.cs.umb.edu/twiki/pub/UBIF/EnumerationTypes/UBIF-Docu-Enumerations.html#RevisionStatusEnum][UBIF enumeration info]] for a tabular overview of values.
Revision Status may be applied to the entire data collection as well as to individual objects (a specimen, a class description, etc.). Exact semantics are only defined for the first and the last category. The semantics of the intermediate (level 1 to 5) may be chosen freely by the user. The relative positions should be maintained, however: If, for example, three revision steps are planned (2 intermediate, reaching <nop>FullyRevised on third), it would be recommended to use <nop>RevisionLevel2, <nop>RevisionLevel4, <nop>FullyRevised.
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 25 Aug 2004
@