61 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
61 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
head 1.2;
|
|
access;
|
|
symbols;
|
|
locks;
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
date 2003.11.21.10.15.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
desc
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
log
|
|
@Added topic name via script
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@---+!! %TOPIC%
|
|
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1069409700" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="NameForStandard"}%
|
|
(This is a discussion area based on the previous extensive discussions in person and on the email list, documented in NameForStandard.)
|
|
|
|
I think we just have to come out with some really personal choices. I held myself back partly because I did like the idea (first raised by Chuck) to forge a family of multiple tdwg standards that have a common naming pattern. I proposed this in the plenary summary discussion in Lisbon (twdg 2003) but the other groups were not very enthusiastic. So, we are free to choose.
|
|
|
|
Anyway, my preferences are:
|
|
|
|
1. <nop>DescriptionML - we can correctly grab a broad are, SDD is not restricted to biology<br/>
|
|
2. <nop>SDD - Structured Descriptive Data<br/>
|
|
3. <nop>CompL (spoken compel) - comparative data language<br/>
|
|
4. <nop>xDelta - to honor Delta<br/>
|
|
|
|
(or <nop>ComeOn, <nop>ComparativE Ontology Notation?)
|
|
|
|
Please add your hitlists, maybe something will emerge!
|
|
|
|
Gregor Hagedorn - 21 Nov 2003
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 2
|
|
@
|