wiki-archive/twiki/data/TIPAdmin/SkypeMeeting20051208.txt

40 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext

%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1134032473" format="1.1" version="1.4"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="InternalMeetings"}%
---+Skype Meeting for 2005-12-08 9am UTC
---++ Report Review Process
* What process would we like to see followed?
* How do we handle the feedback? Do we write updated reports or do the TDWG Executive add addenda, take actions, make recommendations?
---++ GUID Related
---+++ Overlapping of GUID2 and TAG1?
How do we manage to get the GUIDs deliverables done as a firm base for architecture work and not let TAG discussions get in the way of GUID decision making. Suggestion - Roger - you have to write a charter for the TAG!
---+++ GUID + RDF + GML
* Are GML and RDF complementary or competitors?
* How to introduce RDF/SW approach to data modeling in GUID?
* How to make transition from existing knowledge in XML Schema?
* Inventory of deployed resources (DiGIR + ABCD, TCS, SDD) and relationship to RDF approach
---+++ GUID Meeting Arrangements
* Discuss Agenda (including Donald's suggestions).
* Current head count. Should we invite 4 more people or should we keep numbers low? Financial considerations.
* Break-out groups are going to be necessary for this size groups - who chairs them and what problems do they address?
* What roles should Donald, Ricardo an Roger play?
* What outcomes do we NEED?
-- Main.RicardoPereira - 07 Dec 2005
---++ Documentation of current standards
Should we offer to pay SDD, ABCD and TCS teams to produce documentation in correct format?
* Yes, as long as we have templates for them to follow.
* If we pay, they are contracts (or meetings but I don't think this task can be done at a meeting?) so do we know WHO would achieve requirements?
---++ 'Old' Standards
* Process group responsibility? Probably not.
* Are they being used?
* Lower priority (establish the process we need and get all on track, then go back a tidy up as funds/time allows)
-- Main.RogerHyam - 07 Dec 2005