140 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
140 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
head 1.4;
|
|
access;
|
|
symbols;
|
|
locks; strict;
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|
expand @o@;
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
date 2005.12.08.09.01.13; author LeeBelbin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.3;
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
date 2005.12.07.21.34.54; author LeeBelbin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.2;
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
date 2005.12.07.12.49.48; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
date 2005.12.07.11.21.51; author RogerHyam; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
desc
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1134032473" format="1.1" version="1.4"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="InternalMeetings"}%
|
|
---+Skype Meeting for 2005-12-08 9am UTC
|
|
|
|
---++ Report Review Process
|
|
* What process would we like to see followed?
|
|
* How do we handle the feedback? Do we write updated reports or do the TDWG Executive add addenda, take actions, make recommendations?
|
|
|
|
---++ GUID Related
|
|
|
|
---+++ Overlapping of GUID2 and TAG1?
|
|
How do we manage to get the GUIDs deliverables done as a firm base for architecture work and not let TAG discussions get in the way of GUID decision making. Suggestion - Roger - you have to write a charter for the TAG!
|
|
|
|
---+++ GUID + RDF + GML
|
|
* Are GML and RDF complementary or competitors?
|
|
* How to introduce RDF/SW approach to data modeling in GUID?
|
|
* How to make transition from existing knowledge in XML Schema?
|
|
* Inventory of deployed resources (DiGIR + ABCD, TCS, SDD) and relationship to RDF approach
|
|
|
|
---+++ GUID Meeting Arrangements
|
|
* Discuss Agenda (including Donald's suggestions).
|
|
* Current head count. Should we invite 4 more people or should we keep numbers low? Financial considerations.
|
|
* Break-out groups are going to be necessary for this size groups - who chairs them and what problems do they address?
|
|
* What roles should Donald, Ricardo an Roger play?
|
|
* What outcomes do we NEED?
|
|
|
|
-- Main.RicardoPereira - 07 Dec 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
---++ Documentation of current standards
|
|
Should we offer to pay SDD, ABCD and TCS teams to produce documentation in correct format?
|
|
* Yes, as long as we have templates for them to follow.
|
|
* If we pay, they are contracts (or meetings but I don't think this task can be done at a meeting?) so do we know WHO would achieve requirements?
|
|
|
|
---++ 'Old' Standards
|
|
* Process group responsibility? Probably not.
|
|
* Are they being used?
|
|
* Lower priority (establish the process we need and get all on track, then go back a tidy up as funds/time allows)
|
|
|
|
-- Main.RogerHyam - 07 Dec 2005@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1133991294" format="1.1" version="1.3"}%
|
|
d12 1
|
|
a12 1
|
|
How do we manage to get the GUIDs deliverables done as a firm base for architecture work and not let TAG discussions get in the way of GUID decision making. Suggstion - Roger - you have to write a charter for the TAG!
|
|
d40 1
|
|
a40 1
|
|
-- Main.RogerHyam - 07 Dec 2005
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RicardoPereira" date="1133959788" format="1.1" version="1.2"}%
|
|
d5 4
|
|
d12 1
|
|
a12 1
|
|
How do we manage to get the GUIDs deliverables done as a firm base for architecture work and not let TAG discussions get in the way of GUID decision making.
|
|
d23 3
|
|
d32 2
|
|
d36 3
|
|
a38 3
|
|
Process group responsibility?
|
|
|
|
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="RogerHyam" date="1133954511" format="1.1" version="1.1"}%
|
|
d3 1
|
|
d5 1
|
|
a5 1
|
|
---+Skype Meeting for 2005-12-08 9am UTC
|
|
d7 1
|
|
a7 1
|
|
---++ Overlapping of GUID2 and TAG1?
|
|
d10 13
|
|
d31 1
|
|
a31 1
|
|
-- Main.RogerHyam - 07 Dec 2005@
|