140 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
140 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
head 1.4;
|
|
access;
|
|
symbols;
|
|
locks; strict;
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.3;
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.2;
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
desc
|
|
@Initial revision
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
log
|
|
@Revision 4
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@---+++ AbcdConcept0148
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Identifier
|
|
|
|
<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Owner/Organisation/Name/Representation/Text</verbatim>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Group
|
|
|
|
Agent
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Subgroup
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Full Name
|
|
|
|
Unit record owner organisation
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Documentation
|
|
|
|
Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit record.
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Content
|
|
|
|
Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit record.
|
|
|
|
---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Example Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Example Explanation
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Reviewer
|
|
|
|
|
|
---++++ Editorial Notes
|
|
|
|
So far, for these pages I have been using the term "unit". Should it be "unit record" or something else?
|
|
|
|
$$Yael$$ Here, we should speak of Unit record; the same is true for the IPR Statements (next item in the schema diagram). I thought I got these things more or less right in the explanations on the unit-level, but found some exeptions (will change in the schema, too):
|
|
|
|
The following should be "unit record" instead of Unit:
|
|
Unit Content Contacts, .. subtypes of the unit (2 cases), Associations, Assemblages
|
|
|
|
The following should be "unit" instead of Sampling Unit (a term not to be used):
|
|
Gathering
|
|
|
|
The following are correctly termed Unit:
|
|
Source Reference, Unit References, Identifications, Kind Of Unit, Multi Media Object, Named Collection Or Surveys, Measurements Or Facts, Sex, Age, Sequences.
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
log
|
|
@Revision 3
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d18 1
|
|
a18 1
|
|
Unit owner organisation name
|
|
d22 1
|
|
a22 1
|
|
Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit.
|
|
d26 1
|
|
a26 1
|
|
Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit.
|
|
a53 1
|
|
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
log
|
|
@Revision 2
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d42 13
|
|
a54 1
|
|
$$Walter$$ So far, for these pages I have been using the term "unit". Should it be "unit record" or something else?
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
log
|
|
@Initial revision
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@a0 1
|
|
|
|
d11 1
|
|
d18 1
|
|
d22 1
|
|
d26 1
|
|
d42 1
|
|
a42 1
|
|
|
|
@
|