wiki-archive/twiki/data/ABCD/AbcdConcept0372.txt,v

166 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext

head 1.6;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
1.6
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.5;
1.5
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.4;
1.4
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.3;
1.3
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@Initial revision
@
1.6
log
@Revision 6
@
text
@---+++ AbcdConcept0372
---+++++ Identifier
<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Identifications/Identification/Identifiers/IdentificationSource</verbatim>
---+++++ Group
Identification
---+++++ Subgroup
---+++++ Full Name
---+++++ Documentation
---+++++ Content
A (bibliographic) reference which has provided the unit identification (and - if present - the identifier's name and/or organisation). The entire identification event was taken from the source given here.
It is not recommended to cite "field tag", or "determination slip" here as the source of the identification but to restrict this to published works. However, it is recommended to record the reference also when the specimen's identity is simply listed in the material examined section.
Note that this is not the literature (e.g. key) used to obtain the identification result (see <verbatim>IdentificationReferences).</verbatim>
---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values
---+++++ Example Value
---+++++ Example Explanation
---+++++ Reviewer
Berendsohn 10 Apr 2005
---++++ Editorial Notes
@
1.5
log
@Revision 5
@
text
@a42 6
I am not sure I understand the explanation here. Does this item refer to a reference for - the source of the identification for the unit that is recorded in this unit record?? (not a reference for the identification of the unit itself but for the identification recorded here)?
Is it clear now? When I find one of my specimens cited in an authoritative work under a specific name, that name becomes a identification result, the author becomes the identifier, and the work is cited here.
$$Walter$$ Yes, thanks.
@
1.4
log
@Revision 4
@
text
@d46 3
a48 1
$$Yael$$ Is it clear now? When I find one of my specimens cited in an authoritative work under a specific name, that name becomes a identification result, the author becomes the identifier, and the work is cited here.
@
1.3
log
@Revision 3
@
text
@d24 1
a24 1
A reference which has provided the unit identification (and - if present - the identifier's name and/or organisation). The entire identification event was taken from the source given here.
d26 3
a28 1
Note that this is not the literature (e.g. key) used to obtain the result (see IdentificationReferences).
d40 1
d42 1
d44 1
a44 1
---++++ Editorial Notes
d46 1
a46 1
$$Walter$$ I am not sure I understand the explanation here. Does this item refer to a reference for - the source of the identification for the unit that is recorded in this unit record?? (not a reference for the identification of the unit itself but for the identification recorded here)?
@
1.2
log
@Revision 2
@
text
@d42 1
a42 1
$$Walter$$ I did not understand the explanation here. Does this item refer to a reference for - the source of the identification for the unit that is recorded in this unit record?? (not a reference for the identification of the unit itself but for the identification recorded here)?
@
1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@a0 1
d11 1
d24 3
d42 1
a42 1
@