8292f46be9
This PR fixes some accessibility issues in our theme docs (i.e. not generated code) flagged by #1513. Here, I target changes that I say are not "systemic", i.e. issues that are easily resolvable by changing our copy and page structure (rather than issues that are created by how kramdown/rouge generates HTML, or reworking our color themes). Here's a quick summary of the manual changes I made: - ~~writing some JS to set `tabindex="0"` on all code blocks; I'd prefer a ruby-native solution, but that involves writing Ruby code, which is incompatible with the pages gem~~ I've moved this to #1533 - rewriting many headings named "Example" which were almost always h4s into more descriptive headings + the appropriate heading level, adding .text-delta to maintain the previous style when necessary - removing some old heading ID hacks in `index-test` that are no longer necessary, since Jekyll does this automatically now - fixing the table headings in `docs/utilities/layout.md` - adding accessible titles + descriptions to the mermaid examples - occasionally, slightly moving around copy to make it align with new headings If you test with #1513 with the following rules disabled: ```rb skipped_rules = [ 'color-contrast', # requires theme auditing # issues w/ autogenerated footnotes 'aria-allowed-role', 'landmark-no-duplicate-contentinfo', 'landmark-unique', 'aria-deprecated-role', # issues w/ markdown checkboxes 'label' ] ``` You should get passing tests :) which is awesome! ## next steps 1. we need to do a pass over our docs copy - very inconsistent. This has been a pain point for me for a while now, just need to find time to sit down and do it. In particular, I'd love to standardize how we display example code (perhaps even hiding it with `<details>` and `<summary>`?), our headings language, what goes into the ToC, our overall writing style, etc. 2. ~~I don't love the JS hack for adding `tabindex="0"` to code blocks (so that they are keyboard-focusable). Ideally, we'd add a custom formatter to rouge to do this, but we can't execute arbitrary Ruby code when users use `github-pages`. I'll look into this some more - maybe rouge would be open to adding this as a feature.~~ see: #1533 4. There are some systemic issues that need a deeper look: 1. The most common issue is still color-contrast. Fixing this involves: - looking at our whites/blacks/grays for core text and highlighting - reevaluating our syntax highlighting themes - fixing dark mode, once and for all :) - also, picking accessible callout colours! 2. kramdown's autogenerated footnotes feature creates a bunch of errors that aXe flags: it seems like a deprecated aria role is being used, and perhaps some misuse of markup. Need to look into this more before I can make a solid attempt at resolving this issue. 3. We demonstrate the use of `- [ ]`, but this generates `<input type="checkbox">` values with no label. I'm not entirely sure what the best way to fix this problem is (without writing custom Ruby code). I'll have to think about this some more. --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Ball <michael@mball.co>
1.2 KiB
| title | parent | nav_order |
|---|---|---|
| Excluding Pages | Main Navigation | 2 |
Excluding Pages
For specific pages that you do not wish to include in the main navigation (e.g., a 404 page or a landing page) set nav_exclude: true in their front matter.
Example: using nav_exclude
{: .text-delta }
---
layout: default
title: 404
nav_exclude: true
permalink: /404
---
The nav_exclude parameter does not affect the [breadcrumbs]({% link docs/navigation/parents.md %}), nor the [lists of child pages]({% link docs/navigation/children.md %}), which you can use to access pages excluded from the main navigation.
Pages with no title are automatically excluded from the main navigation, except when they are in collections (where Jekyll provides default titles based on file names).
Child pages are automatically excluded from the main navigation when their parent page is excluded.
{: .warning }
It is currently possible to exclude all the child pages of a page from the main navigation by setting has_children: false in its front matter. However, the has_children parameter may be ignored altogether in a future release, so it is better to use the nav_exclude parameter on each child page.