89 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
89 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
head 1.3;
|
||
|
access;
|
||
|
symbols;
|
||
|
locks; strict;
|
||
|
comment @# @;
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3
|
||
|
date 2007.01.19.00.00.00; author RobertHuber; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next 1.2;
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.2
|
||
|
date 2006.01.17.21.15.01; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next 1.1;
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
||
|
date 2006.01.17.21.14.37; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
|
||
|
branches;
|
||
|
next ;
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
desc
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
.
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.3
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@Comment added
|
||
|
.
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@---++ Use Case: Identifiying Different Specimen Preparations
|
||
|
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
---+++++ Description
|
||
|
Different communities within biological collections have different sets of biological _objects_ they want to assign identifiers to. For example, an entomological collection may have the following series of _specimens_:
|
||
|
|
||
|
survey->contents of a trap->individual insect->insect part->DNA preparation
|
||
|
|
||
|
Other communities have a different set of identifiable objects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some users may be interested in a particular preparation (e.g. give me all records of mammal tissues from which a destructive sample can be extracted), while others may not (e.g., give me all occurrences of _Acacia polyphylla_ from Brazil).
|
||
|
|
||
|
---+++++ Categories
|
||
|
CategoryUseCases
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
---++ Comments
|
||
|
Use the space below to make comments about this page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
------
|
||
|
|
||
|
%ICON{bubble}% Posted by Main.RobertHuber - 2006-01-18 11:16:41
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is an interesting project from the geo community which tries to build a central sample registry (SESAR): http://www.geosamples.org/<br />
|
||
|
Also the IODP (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program) is thinking about introducing Ids (real GUIDs here) for samples (core->core section->samples)<br />
|
||
|
<br />
|
||
|
This sounds very similar to the approach above, at least until DNA preparation. Maybe we should distinguish between sample and sample preparation?<br />
|
||
|
<br />
|
||
|
Maybe it would be a good idea to initiate something like a 'common sample guid project' and build up a interdisciplinary globally unique sample identification scheme?
|
||
|
|
||
|
------
|
||
|
|
||
|
%ICON{bubble}% @
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.2
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
.
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@d14 20
|
||
|
a33 1
|
||
|
CategoryUseCases@
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
1.1
|
||
|
log
|
||
|
@Initial revision
|
||
|
@
|
||
|
text
|
||
|
@d6 1
|
||
|
@
|