wiki-archive/twiki/data/GUID/IdentifiyingPreparations.txt,v

89 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext

head 1.3;
access;
symbols;
locks; strict;
comment @# @;
1.3
date 2007.01.19.00.00.00; author RobertHuber; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.2;
1.2
date 2006.01.17.21.15.01; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
branches;
next 1.1;
1.1
date 2006.01.17.21.14.37; author RicardoPereira; state Exp;
branches;
next ;
desc
@
.
@
1.3
log
@Comment added
.
@
text
@---++ Use Case: Identifiying Different Specimen Preparations
----
---+++++ Description
Different communities within biological collections have different sets of biological _objects_ they want to assign identifiers to. For example, an entomological collection may have the following series of _specimens_:
survey->contents of a trap->individual insect->insect part->DNA preparation
Other communities have a different set of identifiable objects.
Some users may be interested in a particular preparation (e.g. give me all records of mammal tissues from which a destructive sample can be extracted), while others may not (e.g., give me all occurrences of _Acacia polyphylla_ from Brazil).
---+++++ Categories
CategoryUseCases
---++ Comments
Use the space below to make comments about this page.
------
%ICON{bubble}% Posted by Main.RobertHuber - 2006-01-18 11:16:41
There is an interesting project from the geo community which tries to build a central sample registry (SESAR): http://www.geosamples.org/<br />
Also the IODP (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program) is thinking about introducing Ids (real GUIDs here) for samples (core-&gt;core section-&gt;samples)<br />
<br />
This sounds very similar to the approach above, at least until DNA preparation. Maybe we should distinguish between sample and sample preparation?<br />
<br />
Maybe it would be a good idea to initiate something like a 'common sample guid project' and build up a interdisciplinary globally unique sample identification scheme?
------
%ICON{bubble}% @
1.2
log
@
.
@
text
@d14 20
a33 1
CategoryUseCases@
1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@d6 1
@