174 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
174 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
head 1.8;
|
|
access;
|
|
symbols;
|
|
locks; strict;
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
date 2009.11.20.02.02.04; author LeeBelbin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.7;
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
date 2007.03.06.17.30.00; author TWikiGuest; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.6;
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
date 2004.07.15.18.02.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.5;
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
date 2004.06.11.10.15.50; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.4;
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
date 2004.05.28.12.12.00; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.3;
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
date 2004.05.28.11.31.25; author JessieKennedy; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.2;
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
date 2004.05.25.07.56.11; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
date 2004.05.21.18.13.49; author GregorHagedorn; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
desc
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@%META:TOPICINFO{author="LeeBelbin" date="1258682524" format="1.1" version="1.8"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UBIF.SchemaDiscussion"}%
|
|
---+!! %TOPIC%
|
|
|
|
Rather an esthetic issue: I find <nop>DataSets/DataSet odd-looking. I realize that you can write "data set" or "dataset". Googling "dataset" retrieves a wild mixture of both spellings, with "<nop>DataSet" used mostly in .NET/ADO.NET related documents. The <nop>DublinCore (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/) uses "Dataset", with a lower case "s".
|
|
|
|
If nobody contradicts, I would prefer doing that. Main.BDI is taking the Dataset up from ABCD - was there a discussion in ABCD on this?
|
|
|
|
-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 21 May 2004
|
|
|
|
In English it should be data set (although Word recognises dataset!) and therefore I would expect to write <nop>DataSet but I don't think it is that important and will go with whatever decision - so I'll assume Dataset unless I hear differently.
|
|
|
|
-- Main.JessieKennedy - 28 May 2004
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I think <nop>DublinCore usuage is good precedence. Esthetic reason is less the <nop>DataSet itself, but possible combinations like <nop>DataSetMetadataType. I will change to Dataset and <nop>DatasetMetadataType etc.
|
|
|
|
-- [[Main.GregorHagedorn][Gregor Hagedorn]] - 28 May 2004
|
|
|
|
%META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1089915445" from="SDD.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization" to="UBIF.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization"}%
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
log
|
|
@Added topic name via script
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 2
|
|
a4 2
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1089914520" format="1.0" version="1.6"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UBIF.SchemaDiscussion"}%
|
|
d7 1
|
|
a7 1
|
|
If nobody contradicts, I would prefer doing that. SDD is taking the Dataset up from ABCD - was there a discussion in ABCD on this?
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 2
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 2
|
|
a2 2
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1086948950" format="1.0" version="1.5"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="UnifiedBioInfoFramework"}%
|
|
d17 1
|
|
a17 1
|
|
%META:TOPICMOVED{by="GregorHagedorn" date="1085746259" from="SDD.DatasetCapitalization" to="SDD.ResolvedTopicDatasetCapitalization"}%
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 2
|
|
a2 2
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085746320" format="1.0" version="1.4"}%
|
|
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="OverarchingPatternsForTdwgSchemata"}%
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="JessieKennedy" date="1085743885" format="1.0" version="1.3"}%
|
|
d7 1
|
|
a7 1
|
|
-- Main.GregorHagedorn - 21 May 2004
|
|
d11 5
|
|
a15 1
|
|
-- Main.JessieKennedy - 28 May 2004
|
|
d17 1
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085471771" format="1.0" version="1.2"}%
|
|
d8 5
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
log
|
|
@none
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d1 1
|
|
a1 1
|
|
%META:TOPICINFO{author="GregorHagedorn" date="1085163228" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
|
|
d3 1
|
|
a3 1
|
|
Rather estetic issue, but I find <nop>DataSets/DataSet odd looking. I realize that you can write data set or dataset. Googling "dataset" retrieves a wild mixture of both spellings, with <nop>DataSet used mostly in .NET/ADO.NET. The <nop>DublinCore (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/) uses Dataset, with a lower case "s".
|
|
@
|