110 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
110 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
head 1.3;
|
|
access;
|
|
symbols;
|
|
locks; strict;
|
|
comment @# @;
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.2;
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next 1.1;
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
date 2007.01.09.00.00.00; author MoinMoin; state Exp;
|
|
branches;
|
|
next ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
desc
|
|
@Initial revision
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
log
|
|
@Revision 3
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@---+++ AbcdConcept0376
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Identifier
|
|
|
|
<verbatim>DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Identifications/Identification/Identifiers/IdentifierRole</verbatim>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Group
|
|
|
|
Identification
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Subgroup
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Full Name
|
|
Identification type
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Documentation
|
|
|
|
An indication of the nature of the verification
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Content
|
|
|
|
An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." for a confirmation event or "det." for an identification for which full credit goes to the identifier).
|
|
|
|
---++++ Recommended or Prescribed Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Example Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Example Explanation
|
|
|
|
|
|
---+++++ Reviewer
|
|
|
|
|
|
---++++ Editorial Notes
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
log
|
|
@Revision 2
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@d17 1
|
|
a17 1
|
|
|
|
d21 1
|
|
a21 1
|
|
An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det.").
|
|
d25 1
|
|
a25 1
|
|
An indication of the nature of the taxonomic verification (e.g. "conf." or "det.").
|
|
a39 2
|
|
|
|
$$Walter$$ I was curious - why does this element come under 'Identifier' and not directly under identification? Also, should I give a fullname of 'IdentifierRole' or something like 'IdentificationType'?
|
|
@
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
log
|
|
@Initial revision
|
|
@
|
|
text
|
|
@a0 1
|
|
|
|
d11 1
|
|
d21 1
|
|
d25 1
|
|
d41 1
|
|
a41 1
|
|
|
|
@
|